Team data profile
Portland Timbers
Major League Soccer · 2026 · Position 17 of 30
22 matches · Data cutoff 30 August 2026
Next match
Next match
Minnesota United
Major League Soccer
St.Louis City
FC Dallas
Atlanta UnitedRecent results
Results
Austin FC
Los Angeles FC
San Diego FC
Chicago Fire
Seattle Sounders FCStatistics window
Season and recent record
season
22 matches| Metric | Value | Percentile / league context | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 1.77 goals/match | 70.0th#9 of 30 | 100% |
| Goals allowed | 1.77 goals/match | 73.3th#22 of 30Lower is favourable here. | 100% |
| Expected goals | 1.47 xG/match | 58.3th#13 of 30 | 86% |
| Shots | 13 shots/match | 56.7th#13 of 30 | 100% |
| Shots on target | 4.55 shots/match | 43.3th#17 of 30 | 100% |
| Possession | 50.3% | 51.7th#15 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
| Corners | 4.5 corners/match | 28.3th#22 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
| Cards | 3 cards/match | 86.7th#26 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 36% |
| Fouls | 10 fouls/match | 15.0th#26 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
Season history
Season history
Every season PitchMath holds this club's football for. Browsing here does not change the page address.
Neutral style profile
Recorded tendencies
Every value is a competition percentile with its source coverage.
Possession control
51.7How are these calculated?
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
100% coverage · possessionAttacking volume
56.7How are these calculated?
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
100% coverage · shots, shots on target, goals forDefensive resistance
14.4How are these calculated?
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
100% coverage · goals against, shots against, shots on target againstDirectness proxy
48.3How are these calculated?
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
100% coverage · shots, possessionPhysicality
50.9How are these calculated?
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
68% coverage · fouls, cardsSet-piece relevance
28.3How are these calculated?
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
100% coverage · cornersTempo and pressure proxy
35.8How are these calculated?
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
100% coverage · shots, shots on target, corners, foulsCoverage
What supports this profile
21 of 21 metrics recorded