Team data profile
Orlando City SC
Major League Soccer · 2026 · Position 22 of 30
22 matches · Data cutoff 30 August 2026
Next match
Next match
Recent results
Results
season
22 matches| Metric | Value | Percentile / league context | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 1.68 goals/match | 65.0th#11 of 30 | 100% |
| Goals allowed | 2.45 goals/match | 96.7thBottom 5 #29 of 30Lower is favourable here. | 100% |
| Expected goals | 1.44 xG/match | 45.0th#17 of 30 | 82% |
| Shots | 11.6 shots/match | 15.0thBottom 5 #26 of 30 | 95% |
| Shots on target | 4.67 shots/match | 51.7th#15 of 30 | 95% |
| Possession | 47.7% | 31.7th#21 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 95% |
| Corners | 3.86 corners/match | 8.3th#28 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 95% |
| Cards | 2.75 cards/match | 70.0th#21 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 18% |
| Fouls | 10.3 fouls/match | 18.3th#25 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 95% |
Season history
Season history
Every season PitchMath holds this club's football for. Browsing here does not change the page address.
No team profile is stored for this season — its results are still listed below.
Neutral style profile
Recorded tendencies
Every value is a competition percentile with its source coverage.
Possession control
31.7How are these calculated?
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
96% coverage · possessionAttacking volume
43.9How are these calculated?
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
97% coverage · shots, shots on target, goals forDefensive resistance
2.2How are these calculated?
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
97% coverage · goals against, shots against, shots on target againstDirectness proxy
28.3How are these calculated?
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
96% coverage · shots, possessionPhysicality
44.1How are these calculated?
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
57% coverage · fouls, cardsSet-piece relevance
8.3How are these calculated?
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
96% coverage · cornersTempo and pressure proxy
23.3How are these calculated?
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
96% coverage · shots, shots on target, corners, foulsCoverage
What supports this profile
21 of 21 metrics recorded

San Diego FC
Atlanta United
Toronto FC
New England Revolution
Minnesota United
Real Salt Lake
Chicago Fire
FC Cincinnati
New York Red Bulls