Team data profile
Minnesota United FC
Major League Soccer · 2026 · Position 15 of 30
22 matches · Data cutoff 30 August 2026
Next match
Next match
Recent results
Results
season
22 matches| Metric | Value | Percentile / league context | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 1.36 goals/match | 25.0th#22 of 30 | 100% |
| Goals allowed | 1.45 goals/match | 36.7th#11 of 30Lower is favourable here. | 100% |
| Expected goals | 1.6 xG/match | 75.0th#8 of 30 | 86% |
| Shots | 13.6 shots/match | 65.0th#11 of 30 | 100% |
| Shots on target | 4.91 shots/match | 70.0th#9 of 30 | 100% |
| Possession | 46.2% | 15.0th#26 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
| Corners | 5.64 corners/match | 78.3th#7 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
| Cards | 1.6 cards/match | 5.0th#2 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 23% |
| Fouls | 12 fouls/match | 58.3th#13 of 30Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
Season history
Season history
Every season PitchMath holds this club's football for. Browsing here does not change the page address.
No team profile is stored for this season — its results are still listed below.
Neutral style profile
Recorded tendencies
Every value is a competition percentile with its source coverage.
Possession control
15How are these calculated?
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
100% coverage · possessionAttacking volume
53.3How are these calculated?
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
100% coverage · shots, shots on target, goals forDefensive resistance
65.6How are these calculated?
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
100% coverage · goals against, shots against, shots on target againstDirectness proxy
85How are these calculated?
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
100% coverage · shots, possessionPhysicality
31.6How are these calculated?
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
61% coverage · fouls, cardsSet-piece relevance
78.3How are these calculated?
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
100% coverage · cornersTempo and pressure proxy
67.9How are these calculated?
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
100% coverage · shots, shots on target, corners, foulsCoverage
What supports this profile
21 of 21 metrics recorded

Portland Timbers
FC Dallas
St.Louis City
LA Galaxy
Orlando City SC
San Jose Earthquakes
Atlanta United
Real Salt Lake
San Diego FC