Inter Miami CF
Major League Soccer · 2026Inter Miami CF 3–2 Chicago Fire · Major League Soccer
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Inter Miami CF won 3–2.
- Shots
- 14–15
- Shots on target
- 7–4
- Expected goals
- 2.11–1.9
- Possession
- 53%–47%
Full time
What the match recorded
Inter Miami beat Chicago Fire 3–2. Recorded in this match (Inter Miami – Chicago Fire): shots 14–15, shots on target 7–4, expected goals 2.11–1.9, possession 53%–47%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Inter Miami's recent record differs from the season
moderateInter Miami's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 4 goals/match | 2.63 goals/match | 1.63 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Inter Miami have a visible home split
moderateInter Miami's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 19.7 shots/match | 16.1 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Inter Miami CF favored in 5 of 11 directional metrics · Chicago Fire in 6
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Inter Miami CF / Chicago Fire
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
CF Montréal
New York City FC
FC Cincinnati
Vancouver Whitecaps
Columbus CrewTeam rankings in Major League Soccer
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.