Inter Miami
Major League Soccer · 2026This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
This match
Match statistics
| Metric | Inter Miami | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 21 shots/match▲ | 16 shots/match |
| Shots on target | 8 shots/match▲ | 4 shots/match |
| Expected goals | 2.98 xG/match▲ | 0.82 xG/match |
| Possession | 45% | 55% |
| Corners | 7 corners/match | 5 corners/match |
| Fouls | 15 fouls/match | 10 fouls/match |
| Yellow cards | 2 cards/match | 2 cards/match |
30-second read
What the record shows
The clearest recorded pattern is: Inter Miami's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. A second useful context is: Inter Miami's home-only shot average is above their full-season average. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.
Inter Miami show a distinct attacking-volume record
strongInter Miami's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Inter Miami | Portland Timbers | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 16.2 shots/match | 12 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
| Shots against | 12 shots/match | 18.7 shots/match | 12.1 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Inter Miami have a visible home split
moderateInter Miami's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 21.4 shots/match | 16.2 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Inter Miami's recent record differs from the season
moderateInter Miami's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 3 goals/match | 2.36 goals/match | 1.63 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Metric comparison
Values, percentiles and samples
Inter Miami favored in 11 of 14 directional metrics · Portland Timbers in 0 · 3 too close
Style profile
How the teams compare
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Recent form
Season, last 10 and last 5
Window
Last 5
Window
Last 10
Window
Season
Venue split
Home and away samples
Window
Home team at home / away team away
Schedule context
Rest and recent workload
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
FC Cincinnati
Nashville SC
Los Angeles FC
San Jose Earthquakes
FC Dallas
Real Salt Lake
Colorado RapidsMake a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.