This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
This match
Match statistics
| Metric | Nashville SC | Los Angeles FC |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 6 shots/match | 20 shots/match▲ |
| Shots on target | 4 shots/match | 9 shots/match▲ |
| Expected goals | 0.7 xG/match | 2.02 xG/match▲ |
| Possession | 52% | 48% |
| Corners | 3 corners/match | 10 corners/match |
| Fouls | 10 fouls/match | 8 fouls/match |
| Yellow cards | 2 cards/match | 2 cards/match |
30-second read
What the record shows
The clearest recorded pattern is: A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Los Angeles FC. A second useful context is: Nashville SC's home-only shot average is above their full-season average. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for Los Angeles FC.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | Nashville SC | Los Angeles FC | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 4.02 days | 3.98 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 2 matches | 2 matches | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
Nashville SC have a visible home split
moderateNashville SC's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 14 shots/match | 11.6 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Metric comparison
Values, percentiles and samples
Nashville SC favored in 6 of 14 directional metrics · Los Angeles FC in 3 · 5 too close
Style profile
How the teams compare
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Recent form
Season, last 10 and last 5
Window
Last 5
Window
Last 10
Window
Season
Venue split
Home and away samples
Window
Home team at home / away team away
Schedule context
Rest and recent workload
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.
Nashville SC
St. Louis City
Inter Miami
Portland Timbers
San Jose Earthquakes
FC Dallas
Real Salt Lake
Colorado Rapids