Team data profile
Nottingham Forest
Premier League · 2026 · Position 13 of 20
2 matches · Data cutoff 29 August 2026
Next match
Next match
Tottenham Hotspur
Premier League
Aston Villa
Coventry CityRecent results
Results
Liverpool
Leeds United
Bournemouth
Manchester United
Newcastle Unitedseason
16 matches| Metric | Value | Percentile / league context | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals scored | 1.5 goals/match | 58.3th#19 of 48 | 100% |
| Goals allowed | 1 goal/match | 26.0th#12 of 48Lower is favourable here. | 100% |
| Expected goals | 1.39 xG/match | 70.8thTop 5 #4 of 12 | 38% |
| Shots | 15.6 shots/match | 94.8thTop 5 #3 of 48 | 100% |
| Shots on target | 5.94 shots/match | 94.8thTop 5 #3 of 48 | 100% |
| Possession | 52.8% | 82.3th#9 of 48Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
| Corners | 5.63 corners/match | 92.7th#4 of 48Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
| Cards | 1.91 cards/match | 30.2th#15 of 48Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 69% |
| Fouls | 13.1 fouls/match | 80.2th#10 of 48Descriptive, not a quality claim. | 100% |
Season history
Season history
Every season PitchMath holds this club's football for. Browsing here does not change the page address.
Neutral style profile
Recorded tendencies
Every value is a competition percentile with its source coverage.
Possession control
82.3How are these calculated?
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
100% coverage · possessionAttacking volume
82.6How are these calculated?
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
100% coverage · shots, shots on target, goals forDefensive resistance
70.5How are these calculated?
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
100% coverage · goals against, shots against, shots on target againstDirectness proxy
89How are these calculated?
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
100% coverage · shots, possessionPhysicality
55.2How are these calculated?
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
84% coverage · fouls, cardsSet-piece relevance
92.7How are these calculated?
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
100% coverage · cornersTempo and pressure proxy
90.6How are these calculated?
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
100% coverage · shots, shots on target, corners, foulsCoverage
What supports this profile
15 of 21 metrics recorded