Major League Soccer · 2026Sun, 23 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTCScheduledPre-match analysis
vsPre-match analysis

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Philadelphia Union's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Philadelphia Union's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. Limitation: At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.

Philadelphia Union's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Philadelphia Union's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

2.4 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1.31 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for2.4 goals/match1.31 goals/match1.63 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Philadelphia Union show a distinct attacking-volume record

strong

Philadelphia Union's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

10.2 shots/matchShotsAustin FC · Philadelphia Union15.4 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricAustin FCPhiladelphia UnionBaseline
Shots10.2 shots/match15.4 shots/match13 shots/match
Shots against17.6 shots/match9.38 shots/match12.3 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Austin FC have a visible home split

moderate

Austin FC's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.

11.9 shots/matchShotsHome only · Season10.2 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: home

MetricHome onlySeasonBaseline
Shots11.9 shots/match10.2 shots/match13 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Austin FC favored in 2 of 14 directional metrics · Philadelphia Union in 7 · 5 too close

1.38 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 16/161.31 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 16/161.94 goals/match
0.95 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 13/131.6 xG/match
2.14 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 13/131.65 xG/match
10.2 shots/matchShotsseason · 16/1615.4 shots/match
17.6 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 16/169.38 shots/match
4 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 16/164.56 shots/match
6.88 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 16/163.88 shots/match
47.4%Possessionseason · 16/1645.4%
4.31 corners/matchCornersseason · 16/165.88 corners/match
6.31 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 16/163.19 corners/match
2 cards/matchCardsseason · 3/43.5 cards/match
11 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 16/1615.1 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
25%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 16/1613%
81%Scoring frequencyseason · 16/1669%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Austin FC35
Philadelphia Union18.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Austin FC15.5
Philadelphia Union46.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Austin FC8.9
Philadelphia Union70
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Austin FC21.7
Philadelphia Union98.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Austin FC25
Philadelphia Union95
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 59%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Austin FC16.7
Philadelphia Union86.7
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Austin FC13.8
Philadelphia Union76.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches
1.2 goals/matchGoals scored5/52.4 goals/match
2.6 goals/matchGoals allowed5/52.8 goals/match
0.73 xG/matchExpected goals5/52.2 xG/match
9 shots/matchShots5/518.6 shots/match
3.8 shots/matchShots on target5/56.4 shots/match
47.4%Possession5/538.8%
3.4 corners/matchCorners5/55.4 corners/match
Cards0/0
9 fouls/matchFouls5/513.8 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches
1.5 goals/matchGoals scored10/101.7 goals/match
2.3 goals/matchGoals allowed10/102 goals/match
0.92 xG/matchExpected goals10/101.64 xG/match
10.1 shots/matchShots10/1016.2 shots/match
4.2 shots/matchShots on target10/105.3 shots/match
48.3%Possession10/1043.2%
3.6 corners/matchCorners10/105.4 corners/match
Cards0/1
11.3 fouls/matchFouls10/1014.8 fouls/match

Window

Season

16 / 16 matches
1.38 goals/matchGoals scored16/161.31 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowed16/161.94 goals/match
0.95 xG/matchExpected goals13/131.6 xG/match
10.2 shots/matchShots16/1615.4 shots/match
4 shots/matchShots on target16/164.56 shots/match
47.4%Possession16/1645.4%
4.31 corners/matchCorners16/165.88 corners/match
2 cards/matchCards3/43.5 cards/match
11 fouls/matchFouls16/1615.1 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

8 / 9 matches
1.5 goals/matchGoals scored8/91.67 goals/match
0.88 goals/matchGoals allowed8/92.67 goals/match
0.98 xG/matchExpected goals6/81.64 xG/match
11.9 shots/matchShots8/915.2 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on target8/94.56 shots/match
54.1%Possession8/944.4%
5.38 corners/matchCorners8/94.78 corners/match
Cards2/2
10.9 fouls/matchFouls8/916.3 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

31 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/131 days
0 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/10 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade B · Useful evidencelimited
Season samples16 / 16home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
Freshness31 daysstale at cutoff
  • At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
Analysis cutoff: Sun, 23 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match