Philadelphia Union
Major League Soccer · 2026Philadelphia Union 2–2 Inter Miami CF · Major League Soccer
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Philadelphia Union and Inter Miami CF drew 2–2.
- Shots
- 17–5
- Shots on target
- 6–3
- Expected goals
- 2.59–1.48
- Possession
- 43%–57%
Full time
What the match recorded
Philadelphia Union and Inter Miami CF drew 2–2. Recorded in this match (Philadelphia Union – Inter Miami CF): shots 17–5, shots on target 6–3, expected goals 2.59–1.48, possession 43%–57%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Philadelphia Union's recent record differs from the season
moderatePhiladelphia Union's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 2.4 goals/match | 1.5 goals/match | 1.55 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for Philadelphia Union, Inter Miami CF.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | Philadelphia Union | Inter Miami CF | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 3.06 days | 3.96 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 1 match | 1 match | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
Philadelphia Union show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakPhiladelphia Union's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Philadelphia Union | Inter Miami CF | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 16.3 shots/match | 15.6 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
| Shots against | 9.1 shots/match | 13 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Philadelphia Union: 17 shots, 6 on target, 2.62 xG. Inter Miami CF: 5 shots, 3 on target, 1.44 xG.
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Philadelphia Union 2.62 xG · Inter Miami CF 1.44 xG.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Philadelphia Union favored in 4 of 13 directional metrics · Inter Miami CF in 6 · 3 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 1 match
Philadelphia Union / Inter Miami CF
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
Toronto FC
FC Cincinnati
New York City FC
Columbus Crew
CF Montréal
New York Red Bulls
Nashville SCTeam rankings in Major League Soccer
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.