30-second read
What the record shows
The clearest recorded pattern is: Houston Dynamo's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. A second useful context is: Vancouver Whitecaps's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. Limitation: At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Houston Dynamo's recent record differs from the season
moderateHouston Dynamo's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1 goals/match | 1.38 goals/match | 1.63 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Vancouver Whitecaps show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateVancouver Whitecaps's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Vancouver Whitecaps | Houston Dynamo | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 17.5 shots/match | 13.4 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
| Shots against | 8.33 shots/match | 12 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateVancouver Whitecaps have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 10.1 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Vancouver Whitecaps | Houston Dynamo | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 54.9% | 44.9% | 49.9% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.
Metric comparison
Values, percentiles and samples
Vancouver Whitecaps favored in 12 of 14 directional metrics · Houston Dynamo in 0 · 2 too close
Style profile
How the teams compare
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Recent form
Season, last 10 and last 5
Window
Last 5
Window
Last 10
Window
Season
Venue split
Home and away samples
Window
Home team at home / away team away
Schedule context
Rest and recent workload
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.
Vancouver Whitecaps
FC Dallas
St.Louis City
LA Galaxy
San Jose Earthquakes
Portland Timbers
San Diego FC