Chicago Fire
Major League Soccer · 2026This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
This match
Match statistics
| Metric | Chicago Fire | New York Red Bulls |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 15 shots/match▲ | 9 shots/match |
| Shots on target | 4 shots/match | 4 shots/match |
| Expected goals | 0.91 xG/match | 1.48 xG/match▲ |
| Possession | 64% | 36% |
| Corners | 6 corners/match | 3 corners/match |
| Fouls | 7 fouls/match | 10 fouls/match |
| Yellow cards | 1 cards/match▲ | 3 cards/match |
30-second read
What the record shows
The clearest recorded pattern is: Chicago Fire's last-five shots average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Chicago Fire's home-only shot average is above their full-season average. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.
Chicago Fire's recent record differs from the season
moderateChicago Fire's last-five shots average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 20 shots/match | 15.1 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Chicago Fire have a visible home split
moderateChicago Fire's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 17.7 shots/match | 15.1 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Chicago Fire show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakChicago Fire's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Chicago Fire | New York Red Bulls | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 15.1 shots/match | 14 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
| Shots against | 11.6 shots/match | 13 shots/match | 12.4 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Metric comparison
Values, percentiles and samples
Chicago Fire favored in 9 of 14 directional metrics · New York Red Bulls in 0 · 5 too close
Style profile
How the teams compare
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Recent form
Season, last 10 and last 5
Window
Last 5
Window
Last 10
Window
Season
Venue split
Home and away samples
Window
Home team at home / away team away
Schedule context
Rest and recent workload
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
DC United
Columbus Crew
Toronto FC
Inter Miami
CF Montreal
Orlando City SCMake a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.