Columbus Crew
Major League Soccer · 2026This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
This match
Match statistics
| Metric | Columbus Crew | Minnesota United FC |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 13 shots/match▲ | 11 shots/match |
| Shots on target | 4 shots/match | 6 shots/match▲ |
| Expected goals | 1.04 xG/match | 1.12 xG/match▲ |
| Possession | 66% | 34% |
| Corners | 4 corners/match | 6 corners/match |
| Fouls | 9 fouls/match | 10 fouls/match |
| Yellow cards | 2 cards/match | 2 cards/match |
30-second read
What the record shows
The clearest recorded pattern is: Minnesota United FC's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. A second useful context is: A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Columbus Crew, Minnesota United FC. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.
Minnesota United FC's recent record differs from the season
moderateMinnesota United FC's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1.6 goals/match | 1.27 goals/match | 1.55 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for Columbus Crew, Minnesota United FC.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | Columbus Crew | Minnesota United FC | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 7 days | 7.11 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 3 matches | 3 matches | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateColumbus Crew have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.1 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Columbus Crew | Minnesota United FC | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 55.7% | 43.6% | 48.9% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Metric comparison
Values, percentiles and samples
Columbus Crew favored in 6 of 14 directional metrics · Minnesota United FC in 3 · 5 too close
Style profile
How the teams compare
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Recent form
Season, last 10 and last 5
Window
Last 5
Window
Last 10
Window
Season
Venue split
Home and away samples
Window
Home team at home / away team away
Schedule context
Rest and recent workload
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
Philadelphia Union
Nashville SC
Atlanta United FC
CF Montreal
New York Red Bulls
FC Dallas
New England Revolution
CharlotteMake a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.