Major League Soccer · 2026Sun, 2 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTCScheduledPre-match analysis
vsPre-match analysis

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Sporting Kansas City's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Houston Dynamo's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.

Sporting Kansas City's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Sporting Kansas City's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

2 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1.13 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for2 goals/match1.13 goals/match1.63 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Houston Dynamo show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Houston Dynamo's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

9.56 shots/matchShotsSporting Kansas City · Houston Dynamo13.5 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricSporting Kansas CityHouston DynamoBaseline
Shots9.56 shots/match13.5 shots/match13 shots/match
Shots against16.6 shots/match12.2 shots/match12.3 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Sporting Kansas City favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · Houston Dynamo in 11 · 3 too close

1.13 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 16/151.33 goals/match
2.5 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 16/151.6 goals/match
0.95 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 13/131.09 xG/match
1.98 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 13/131.24 xG/match
9.56 shots/matchShotsseason · 16/1513.5 shots/match
16.6 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 16/1512.2 shots/match
4.13 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 16/154.87 shots/match
6.06 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 16/154.07 shots/match
44.3%Possessionseason · 16/1544.4%
3.81 corners/matchCornersseason · 16/154.4 corners/match
5.94 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 16/154.8 corners/match
1.33 cards/matchCardsseason · 3/63 cards/match
13.5 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 16/1510.3 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
0%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 16/1527%
69%Scoring frequencyseason · 16/1573%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Sporting Kansas City8.3
Houston Dynamo11.7
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Sporting Kansas City7.8
Houston Dynamo48.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Sporting Kansas City10
Houston Dynamo61.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Sporting Kansas City25
Houston Dynamo88.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Sporting Kansas City43.3
Houston Dynamo50
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 59%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Sporting Kansas City8.3
Houston Dynamo21.7
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Sporting Kansas City26.2
Houston Dynamo41.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches
2 goals/matchGoals scored5/51.4 goals/match
1.6 goals/matchGoals allowed5/51.2 goals/match
1.49 xG/matchExpected goals5/50.96 xG/match
14.6 shots/matchShots5/514 shots/match
6.6 shots/matchShots on target5/55.4 shots/match
47.4%Possession5/548.6%
5.2 corners/matchCorners5/52.6 corners/match
Cards0/1
14.6 fouls/matchFouls5/511.2 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches
1.2 goals/matchGoals scored10/101.2 goals/match
2.6 goals/matchGoals allowed10/101.4 goals/match
1.04 xG/matchExpected goals10/101.03 xG/match
11.3 shots/matchShots10/1013.8 shots/match
4.8 shots/matchShots on target10/105.3 shots/match
43.7%Possession10/1045.5%
4.2 corners/matchCorners10/103.2 corners/match
Cards0/2
14.4 fouls/matchFouls10/1010.7 fouls/match

Window

Season

16 / 15 matches
1.13 goals/matchGoals scored16/151.33 goals/match
2.5 goals/matchGoals allowed16/151.6 goals/match
0.95 xG/matchExpected goals13/131.09 xG/match
9.56 shots/matchShots16/1513.5 shots/match
4.13 shots/matchShots on target16/154.87 shots/match
44.3%Possession16/1544.4%
3.81 corners/matchCorners16/154.4 corners/match
1.33 cards/matchCards3/63 cards/match
13.5 fouls/matchFouls16/1510.3 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

8 / 7 matches
1.38 goals/matchGoals scored8/71.57 goals/match
1.88 goals/matchGoals allowed8/72.43 goals/match
1.29 xG/matchExpected goals6/71.26 xG/match
10.3 shots/matchShots8/713.7 shots/match
5.38 shots/matchShots on target8/75.29 shots/match
43.1%Possession8/744.9%
3.88 corners/matchCorners8/73.71 corners/match
Cards2/1
12.1 fouls/matchFouls8/711 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

10 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/110 days
1 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/11 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready
Season samples16 / 15home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
Freshness10 daysfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Analysis cutoff: Sun, 2 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match