Inter Miami CF
Major League Soccer · 2026Inter Miami CF 2–2 Columbus Crew · Major League Soccer
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Inter Miami CF and Columbus Crew drew 2–2.
- Shots
- 12–13
- Shots on target
- 4–3
- Expected goals
- 1.61–1.07
- Possession
- 51%–49%
Full time
What the match recorded
Inter Miami CF and Columbus Crew drew 2–2. Recorded in this match (Inter Miami CF – Columbus Crew): shots 12–13, shots on target 4–3, expected goals 1.61–1.07, possession 51%–49%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Inter Miami CF have a visible home split
moderateInter Miami CF's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 18.8 shots/match | 16.1 shots/match | 12.9 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Inter Miami CF: 12 shots, 4 on target, 1.27 xG. Columbus Crew: 14 shots, 4 on target, 0.84 xG.
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Inter Miami CF 1.27 xG · Columbus Crew 0.84 xG.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Inter Miami CF favored in 8 of 13 directional metrics · Columbus Crew in 4 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
Inter Miami CF / Columbus Crew
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
CF Montréal
Chicago Fire
Charlotte FC
Minnesota United
San Diego FC
Sporting Kansas City
Houston DynamoTeam rankings in Major League Soccer
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.