Major League Soccer · 2026Sat, 25 Apr 2026, 17:00 UTCFull timeBMO FieldFull-time recap
12Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricToronto FCAtlanta United FC
Shots9 shots/match6 shots/match
Shots on target2 shots/match2 shots/match
Expected goals0.72 xG/match0.61 xG/match
Possession50%50%
Corners7 corners/match7 corners/match
Fouls10 fouls/match15 fouls/match
Yellow cards0 cards/match2 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Toronto FC, Atlanta United FC. A second useful context is: Toronto FC's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.

Recent scheduling adds useful context

moderate

A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Toronto FC, Atlanta United FC.

2.73 daysRest daysToronto FC · Atlanta United FC2.72 days
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.

Window: previous 14 days

MetricToronto FCAtlanta United FCBaseline
Rest days2.73 days2.72 days
Matches last 14 days3 matches3 matches

Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.

Toronto FC's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Toronto FC's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

2.2 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1.7 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for2.2 goals/match1.7 goals/match1.6 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Toronto FC favored in 5 of 14 directional metrics · Atlanta United FC in 2 · 7 too close

1.7 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 10/100.9 goals/match
1.9 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 10/101.7 goals/match
1.24 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 8/71.32 xG/match
0.93 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 8/71.38 xG/match
11.7 shots/matchShotsseason · 10/1011.6 shots/match
10.8 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 10/1011.7 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 10/104.1 shots/match
4.2 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 10/104 shots/match
47.7%Possessionseason · 10/1053.8%
5.8 corners/matchCornersseason · 10/105.1 corners/match
5.5 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 10/105.4 corners/match
2 cards/matchCardsseason · 4/32.33 cards/match
12.6 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 10/1012.4 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
10%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 10/1010%
90%Scoring frequencyseason · 10/1050%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Toronto FC41.7
Atlanta United FC75
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Toronto FC51.1
Atlanta United FC23.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Toronto FC55
Atlanta United FC56.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Toronto FC48.3
Atlanta United FC15
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Toronto FC48.4
Atlanta United FC56.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 65%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Toronto FC78.3
Atlanta United FC60
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Toronto FC60
Atlanta United FC44.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches
2.2 goals/matchGoals scored5/50.8 goals/match
2.2 goals/matchGoals allowed5/51.8 goals/match
1.47 xG/matchExpected goals5/51.24 xG/match
13 shots/matchShots5/513.2 shots/match
4.8 shots/matchShots on target5/55 shots/match
52.6%Possession5/552.6%
5.6 corners/matchCorners5/56.8 corners/match
Cards2/0
14 fouls/matchFouls5/510.6 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches
1.7 goals/matchGoals scored10/100.9 goals/match
1.9 goals/matchGoals allowed10/101.7 goals/match
1.24 xG/matchExpected goals8/71.32 xG/match
11.7 shots/matchShots10/1011.6 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on target10/104.1 shots/match
47.7%Possession10/1053.8%
5.8 corners/matchCorners10/105.1 corners/match
2 cards/matchCards4/32.33 cards/match
12.6 fouls/matchFouls10/1012.4 fouls/match

Window

Season

10 / 10 matches
1.7 goals/matchGoals scored10/100.9 goals/match
1.9 goals/matchGoals allowed10/101.7 goals/match
1.24 xG/matchExpected goals8/71.32 xG/match
11.7 shots/matchShots10/1011.6 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on target10/104.1 shots/match
47.7%Possession10/1053.8%
5.8 corners/matchCorners10/105.1 corners/match
2 cards/matchCards4/32.33 cards/match
12.6 fouls/matchFouls10/1012.4 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

7 / 4 matches
2 goals/matchGoals scored7/40.5 goals/match
1.86 goals/matchGoals allowed7/41.5 goals/match
1.32 xG/matchExpected goals7/2
12.7 shots/matchShots7/410.3 shots/match
5.43 shots/matchShots on target7/43 shots/match
48.4%Possession7/451%
6.14 corners/matchCorners7/46 corners/match
Cards2/2
12.7 fouls/matchFouls7/414.3 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

2.73 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/12.72 days
3 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/13 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready
Season samples10 / 10home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 25 Apr 2026, 21:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match