Major League Soccer · 2026Sat, 14 Mar 2026, 19:15 UTCFull timeMercedes-Benz StadiumFull-time recap
31Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricAtlanta United FCPhiladelphia Union
Shots11 shots/match14 shots/match
Shots on target4 shots/match3 shots/match
Expected goals2.79 xG/match2.13 xG/match
Possession42%58%
Corners4 corners/match6 corners/match
Fouls15 fouls/match12 fouls/match
Yellow cards4 cards/match0 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Each team's season fouls average is above the competition baseline. A second useful context is: Atlanta United FC's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

Both teams have elevated fouls records

weak

Each team's season fouls average is above the competition baseline.

16 fouls/matchFoulsAtlanta United FC · Philadelphia Union15 fouls/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Both team averages are compared with the same competition baseline.

Window: season

MetricAtlanta United FCPhiladelphia UnionBaseline
Fouls16 fouls/match15 fouls/match12 fouls/match

Caveat: A shared historical pattern is descriptive and may not repeat in one fixture.

Atlanta United FC show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Atlanta United FC's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

10.8 shots/matchShotsAtlanta United FC · Philadelphia Union13.8 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricAtlanta United FCPhiladelphia UnionBaseline
Shots10.8 shots/match13.8 shots/match11.8 shots/match
Shots against11.5 shots/match9.5 shots/match11.8 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Atlanta United FC favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · Philadelphia Union in 0 · 14 too close

1.25 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 4/40.5 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 4/41.75 goals/match
Expected goalsseason · 1/1
Expected goals allowedseason · 1/1
10.8 shots/matchShotsseason · 4/413.8 shots/match
11.5 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 4/49.5 shots/match
3.25 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 4/43.5 shots/match
3.75 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 4/44.25 shots/match
51%Possessionseason · 4/451.5%
3.5 corners/matchCornersseason · 4/46.75 corners/match
5 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 4/42.5 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCardsseason · 3/34 cards/match
16 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 4/415 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
0%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 4/40%
50%Scoring frequencyseason · 4/450%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Atlanta United FC55.4
Philadelphia Union58.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Atlanta United FC28
Philadelphia Union38.7
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Atlanta United FC47
Philadelphia Union48.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Atlanta United FC30.4
Philadelphia Union83.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Atlanta United FC83.8
Philadelphia Union92.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 88%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Atlanta United FC17.9
Philadelphia Union83.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Atlanta United FC38.9
Philadelphia Union70.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

4 / 4 matches
1.25 goals/matchGoals scored4/40.5 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowed4/41.75 goals/match
Expected goals1/1
10.8 shots/matchShots4/413.8 shots/match
3.25 shots/matchShots on target4/43.5 shots/match
51%Possession4/451.5%
3.5 corners/matchCorners4/46.75 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCards3/34 cards/match
16 fouls/matchFouls4/415 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

4 / 4 matches
1.25 goals/matchGoals scored4/40.5 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowed4/41.75 goals/match
Expected goals1/1
10.8 shots/matchShots4/413.8 shots/match
3.25 shots/matchShots on target4/43.5 shots/match
51%Possession4/451.5%
3.5 corners/matchCorners4/46.75 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCards3/34 cards/match
16 fouls/matchFouls4/415 fouls/match

Window

Season

4 / 4 matches
1.25 goals/matchGoals scored4/40.5 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowed4/41.75 goals/match
Expected goals1/1
10.8 shots/matchShots4/413.8 shots/match
3.25 shots/matchShots on target4/43.5 shots/match
51%Possession4/451.5%
3.5 corners/matchCorners4/46.75 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCards3/34 cards/match
16 fouls/matchFouls4/415 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

2 / 2 matches
Goals scored2/2
Goals allowed2/2
Expected goals1/1
Shots2/2
Shots on target2/2
Possession2/2
Corners2/2
Cards1/1
Fouls2/2

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

6.78 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/16.78 days
2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited
Season samples4 / 4home / away teams
Recent samples4 / 4last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 14 Mar 2026, 23:15 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match