New York Red Bulls
Major League Soccer · 2026New York Red Bulls 0–3 CF Montréal · Major League Soccer
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
CF Montréal won 0–3.
- Shots
- 12–10
- Shots on target
- 4–4
- Possession
- 67%–33%
Full time
What the match recorded
CF Montreal beat New York Red Bulls 3–0. Recorded in this match (New York Red Bulls – CF Montreal): shots 12–10, shots on target 4–4, possession 67%–33%, corners 11–4. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
CF Montreal show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakCF Montreal's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | New York Red Bulls | CF Montreal | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 15.3 shots/match | 6.67 shots/match | 12 shots/match |
| Shots against | 10.7 shots/match | 13 shots/match | 11.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
The teams have contrasting possession records
weakNew York Red Bulls have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 21.3 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | New York Red Bulls | CF Montreal | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 61.3% | 40% | 49.3% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: New York Red Bulls favored in 0 of 9 directional metrics · CF Montréal in 0 · 9 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Rest before fixture · Both teams: 8.04 days
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 1 match
New York Red Bulls / CF Montréal
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
- Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
More football
Related matches
Toronto FC
Orlando City SC
FC Cincinnati
Los Angeles FC
FC DallasTeam rankings in Major League Soccer
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.