This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
This match
Match statistics
| Metric | Manchester City | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 13 shots/match | 14 shots/match▲ |
| Shots on target | 5 shots/match▲ | 3 shots/match |
| Possession | 56% | 44% |
| Corners | 4 corners/match | 4 corners/match |
| Fouls | 8 fouls/match | 10 fouls/match |
| Yellow cards | 3 cards/match | 1 cards/match▲ |
30-second read
What the record shows
The clearest recorded pattern is: A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Manchester City. A second useful context is: Fulham's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. Limitation: Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for Manchester City.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | Manchester City | Fulham | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 3.12 days | 4.19 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 2 matches | 2 matches | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
Fulham's recent record differs from the season
moderateFulham's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1 goals/match | 1.35 goals/match | 1.38 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.
Metric comparison
Values, percentiles and samples
Manchester City favored in 9 of 14 directional metrics · Fulham in 0 · 5 too close
Style profile
How the teams compare
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Recent form
Season, last 10 and last 5
Window
Last 5
Window
Last 10
Window
Season
Venue split
Home and away samples
Window
Home team at home / away team away
Schedule context
Rest and recent workload
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against.
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.
Manchester City
Liverpool
Everton
Aston Villa
Brighton
Crystal Palace
Burnley