Fulham vs Hull City · Premier League
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1–1.25
- Expected goals
- 1.55–0.99
- Shots
- 15–9.75
- Possession
- 57%–29.5%
30-second read
What the record shows
The retained record does not give either club a clear edge on the metrics that clear the gates. The closest thing to a difference: fulham have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
The teams have contrasting possession records
weakFulham have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 27.5 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Fulham | Hull City | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 57% | 29.5% | 47.7% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Hull City show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakHull City's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Fulham | Hull City | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 15 shots/match | 9.75 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
| Shots against | 13.5 shots/match | 14.3 shots/match | 13.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Fulham favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Hull City in 0 · 13 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Rest before fixture · Both teams: 35 days
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Fulham / Hull City
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
- At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
- The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
Team rankings in Premier League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.
Fulham
Ipswich Town
Everton
Manchester City
Brentford
Liverpool