Premier League · 2023Sat, 2 Mar 2024, 15:00 UTCFull timeFull-time recap
31Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricTottenham HotspurCrystal Palace
Shots14 shots/match4 shots/match
Shots on target6 shots/match1 shots/match
Expected goals1.91 xG/match0.32 xG/match
Possession78%22%
Corners11 corners/match1 corners/match
Fouls7 fouls/match16 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Rodrigo Bentancur · Tottenham Hotspur · 45′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedTimo Werner · Tottenham Hotspur · 49′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedCristian Romero · Tottenham Hotspur · 68′ · 0.04 xG · on targetSon Heung-min · Tottenham Hotspur · 74′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedTimo Werner · Tottenham Hotspur · 62′ · 0.05 xG · on targetSon Heung-min · Tottenham Hotspur · 53′ · 0.06 xG · off target or blockedDestiny Udogie · Tottenham Hotspur · 55′ · 0.07 xG · off target or blockedJordan Ayew · Crystal Palace · 5′ · 0.08 xG · off target or blockedAdam Wharton · Crystal Palace · 13′ · 0.08 xG · off target or blockedEberechi Eze · Crystal Palace · 59′ · 0.08 xG · goalJean-Philippe Mateta · Crystal Palace · 13′ · 0.09 xG · off target or blockedSon Heung-min · Tottenham Hotspur · 65′ · 0.11 xG · off target or blockedSon Heung-min · Tottenham Hotspur · 54′ · 0.13 xG · off target or blockedCristian Romero · Tottenham Hotspur · 80′ · 0.16 xG · goalSon Heung-min · Tottenham Hotspur · 88′ · 0.21 xG · goalBrennan Johnson · Tottenham Hotspur · 65′ · 0.22 xG · off target or blockedTimo Werner · Tottenham Hotspur · 18′ · 0.24 xG · on targetTimo Werner · Tottenham Hotspur · 77′ · 0.57 xG · goal
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Tottenham Hotspur: 14 shots, 6 on target, 1.95 xG. Crystal Palace: 4 shots, 1 on target, 0.33 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

0120′HT90′Timo Werner · Tottenham Hotspur · 77′Cristian Romero · Tottenham Hotspur · 80′Son Heung-min · Tottenham Hotspur · 88′Eberechi Eze · Crystal Palace · 59′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Tottenham Hotspur 1.95 xG · Crystal Palace 0.33 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Tottenham Hotspur have recorded the higher season possession share. A second useful context is: Crystal Palace's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. Limitation: The fixture is outside the configured active season.

The teams have contrasting possession records

strong

Tottenham Hotspur have recorded the higher season possession share.

60.9%PossessionTottenham Hotspur · Crystal Palace41.2%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 19.7 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricTottenham HotspurCrystal PalaceBaseline
Possession60.9%41.2%48.9%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Crystal Palace's recent record differs from the season

weak

Crystal Palace's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

1.4 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1.19 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for1.4 goals/match1.19 goals/match1.46 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.

4Tottenham Hotspur
0Draws
1Crystal Palace
Crystal PalaceTottenham Hotspur · Premier League12
Tottenham HotspurCrystal Palace · Premier League10
Crystal PalaceTottenham Hotspur · Premier League04
Tottenham HotspurCrystal Palace · Premier League30
Crystal PalaceTottenham Hotspur · Premier League30

Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages · sample sizes shown with each metric. Context, not a forecast.

Where the edge is

Tottenham Hotspur favored in 6 of 13 directional metrics · Crystal Palace in 4 · 3 too close

2.12 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 26/271.19 goals/match
1.5 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 26/271.74 goals/match
1.76 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 26/271.14 xG/match
1.69 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 26/271.46 xG/match
15.7 shots/matchShotsseason · 26/2711.4 shots/match
13 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 26/2712.6 shots/match
5.92 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 26/274.11 shots/match
4.46 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 26/274.19 shots/match
60.9%Possessionseason · 26/2741.2%
6.15 corners/matchCornersseason · 26/274.74 corners/match
6.38 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 26/275.07 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
10.7 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 26/2711.9 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
19%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 26/2722%
100%Scoring frequencyseason · 26/2778%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Tottenham Hotspur87.5
Crystal Palace27.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Tottenham Hotspur80
Crystal Palace20.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Tottenham Hotspur65.8
Crystal Palace63.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Tottenham Hotspur37.5
Crystal Palace57.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Tottenham Hotspur42.5
Crystal Palace72.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Tottenham Hotspur72.5
Crystal Palace37.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Tottenham Hotspur69.4
Crystal Palace38.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Season

Tottenham Hotspur26 matchesCrystal Palace27 matches
2.12 goals/matchGoals scored26/271.19 goals/match
1.5 goals/matchGoals allowed26/271.74 goals/match
1.76 xG/matchExpected goals26/271.14 xG/match
15.7 shots/matchShots26/2711.4 shots/match
5.92 shots/matchShots on target26/274.11 shots/match
60.9%Possession26/2741.2%
6.15 corners/matchCorners26/274.74 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.7 fouls/matchFouls26/2711.9 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

Tottenham Hotspur14 matchesCrystal Palace14 matches
2.07 goals/matchGoals scored14/141 goals/match
1.36 goals/matchGoals allowed14/142 goals/match
2.03 xG/matchExpected goals14/141.04 xG/match
17.5 shots/matchShots14/1410.7 shots/match
6.71 shots/matchShots on target14/144 shots/match
61.5%Possession14/1438.1%
6.93 corners/matchCorners14/143.86 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.3 fouls/matchFouls14/1411.8 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

14 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/17 days
1 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidencelimited
Season samples26 / 27home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • The fixture is outside the configured active season.
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 2 Mar 2024, 19:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match