Premier League · 2023Sat, 11 May 2024, 16:30 UTCFull timeFull-time recap
23Full-time recap

Chelsea

WLDWW

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricNottingham ForestChelsea
Shots20 shots/match12 shots/match
Shots on target4 shots/match5 shots/match
Expected goals1.55 xG/match1.62 xG/match
Possession32%68%
Corners5 corners/match6 corners/match
Fouls14 fouls/match8 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Morgan Gibbs-White · Nottingham Forest · 20′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedOla Aina · Nottingham Forest · 49′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedCallum Hudson Odoi · Nottingham Forest · 56′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedOla Aina · Nottingham Forest · 69′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedRyan Yates · Nottingham Forest · 5′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedRyan Yates · Nottingham Forest · 22′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedBenoît Badiashile · Chelsea · 39′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedDanilo Santos · Nottingham Forest · 57′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedCallum Hudson Odoi · Nottingham Forest · 74′ · 0.03 xG · goalConor Gallagher · Chelsea · 42′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedChris Wood · Nottingham Forest · 45′ · 0.04 xG · on targetRyan Yates · Nottingham Forest · 53′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedThiago Silva · Chelsea · 63′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedMorgan Gibbs-White · Nottingham Forest · 90′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedRyan Yates · Nottingham Forest · 10′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedThiago Silva · Chelsea · 34′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedCallum Hudson Odoi · Nottingham Forest · 45′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedWilly Boly · Nottingham Forest · 16′ · 0.06 xG · goalCallum Hudson Odoi · Nottingham Forest · 71′ · 0.06 xG · off target or blockedRyan Yates · Nottingham Forest · 6′ · 0.08 xG · off target or blockedRaheem Sterling · Chelsea · 80′ · 0.08 xG · goalChristopher Nkunku · Chelsea · 74′ · 0.10 xG · off target or blockedMalo Gusto · Chelsea · 90′ · 0.10 xG · on targetChris Wood · Nottingham Forest · 23′ · 0.11 xG · off target or blockedCole Palmer · Chelsea · 54′ · 0.14 xG · off target or blockedCole Palmer · Chelsea · 67′ · 0.18 xG · off target or blockedMykhailo Mudryk · Chelsea · 8′ · 0.20 xG · goalChris Wood · Nottingham Forest · 2′ · 0.22 xG · on targetMorgan Gibbs-White · Nottingham Forest · 57′ · 0.26 xG · off target or blockedNicolas Jackson · Chelsea · 82′ · 0.27 xG · goalNicolas Jackson · Chelsea · 33′ · 0.40 xG · on targetChris Wood · Nottingham Forest · 57′ · 0.47 xG · off target or blocked
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Nottingham Forest: 20 shots, 4 on target, 1.66 xG. Chelsea: 12 shots, 5 on target, 1.63 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

0120′HT90′Willy Boly · Nottingham Forest · 16′Callum Hudson Odoi · Nottingham Forest · 74′Mykhailo Mudryk · Chelsea · 8′Raheem Sterling · Chelsea · 80′Nicolas Jackson · Chelsea · 82′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Nottingham Forest 1.66 xG · Chelsea 1.63 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Nottingham Forest's last-five shots average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Chelsea have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: The fixture is outside the configured active season.

Nottingham Forest's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Nottingham Forest's last-five shots average is above their season average.

15 shots/matchShotsLast 5 · Season11.9 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Shots15 shots/match11.9 shots/match13.6 shots/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

The teams have contrasting possession records

strong

Chelsea have recorded the higher season possession share.

40.6%PossessionNottingham Forest · Chelsea59.2%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 18.6 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricNottingham ForestChelseaBaseline
Possession40.6%59.2%49.9%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Recent scheduling adds useful context

weak

A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Chelsea.

7.1 daysRest daysNottingham Forest · Chelsea6.15 days
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.

Window: previous 14 days

MetricNottingham ForestChelseaBaseline
Rest days7.1 days6.15 days
Matches last 14 days2 matches3 matches

Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.

1Nottingham Forest
2Draws
0Chelsea
ChelseaNottingham Forest · Premier League01
ChelseaNottingham Forest · Premier League22
Nottingham ForestChelsea · Premier League11

Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages · sample sizes shown with each metric. Context, not a forecast.

Where the edge is

Nottingham Forest favored in 3 of 13 directional metrics · Chelsea in 8 · 2 too close

1.27 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 37/362.03 goals/match
1.78 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 37/361.69 goals/match
1.31 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 37/362.02 xG/match
1.42 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 37/361.54 xG/match
11.9 shots/matchShotsseason · 37/3614.4 shots/match
13.2 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 37/3614.5 shots/match
3.84 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 37/365.64 shots/match
4.54 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 37/365.03 shots/match
40.6%Possessionseason · 37/3659.2%
3.92 corners/matchCornersseason · 37/365.28 corners/match
6.51 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 37/365.03 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
11.4 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 37/3611.9 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
11%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 37/3622%
73%Scoring frequencyseason · 37/3683%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Nottingham Forest7.5
Chelsea77.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Nottingham Forest20.8
Chelsea74.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Nottingham Forest52.5
Chelsea39.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Nottingham Forest77.5
Chelsea12.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Nottingham Forest62.5
Chelsea72.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Nottingham Forest7.5
Chelsea47.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Nottingham Forest28.8
Chelsea66.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Season

Nottingham Forest37 matchesChelsea36 matches
1.27 goals/matchGoals scored37/362.03 goals/match
1.78 goals/matchGoals allowed37/361.69 goals/match
1.31 xG/matchExpected goals37/362.02 xG/match
11.9 shots/matchShots37/3614.4 shots/match
3.84 shots/matchShots on target37/365.64 shots/match
40.6%Possession37/3659.2%
3.92 corners/matchCorners37/365.28 corners/match
Cards0/0
11.4 fouls/matchFouls37/3611.9 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

Nottingham Forest19 matchesChelsea18 matches
1.42 goals/matchGoals scored19/181.72 goals/match
1.58 goals/matchGoals allowed19/182 goals/match
1.33 xG/matchExpected goals19/181.61 xG/match
13.4 shots/matchShots19/1812.3 shots/match
3.95 shots/matchShots on target19/184.72 shots/match
41.3%Possession19/1860.3%
4.32 corners/matchCorners19/184.5 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.7 fouls/matchFouls19/1812.8 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7.1 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/16.15 days
2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/13 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidencelimited
Season samples37 / 36home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • The fixture is outside the configured active season.
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 11 May 2024, 20:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match
Nottingham Forest vs Chelsea — stats, xG & match recap | PitchMath