Major League Soccer · 2026Wed, 22 Jul 2026, 23:30 UTCFull timeGillette StadiumFull-time recap

New England Revolution

WWLWL

0–0Full-time recap

Toronto FC

DLLLD

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	New England Revolution	Toronto FC
Shots	11 shots/match	13 shots/match▲
Shots on target	3 shots/match▲	1 shots/match
Expected goals	1.04 xG/match	1.41 xG/match▲
Possession	64%	36%
Corners	7 corners/match	9 corners/match
Fouls	10 fouls/match	13 fouls/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: New England Revolution's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. A second useful context is: New England Revolution's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.

New England Revolution's recent record differs from the season

moderate

New England Revolution's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.

0.8 goals/match▲Goals forLast 5 · Season1.47 goals/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

Metric	Last 5	Season	Baseline
Goals for	0.8 goals/match	1.47 goals/match	1.63 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

New England Revolution show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

New England Revolution's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

10.1 shots/match▲ShotsNew England Revolution · Toronto FC11.5 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

Metric	New England Revolution	Toronto FC	Baseline
Shots	10.1 shots/match	11.5 shots/match	13 shots/match
Shots against	13.1 shots/match	11.6 shots/match	12.3 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

New England Revolution favored in 4 of 14 directional metrics · Toronto FC in 6 · 4 too close

1.47 goals/match▲Goals scoredseason · 15/161.38 goals/match

1.2 goals/match▲Goals allowedseason · 15/161.81 goals/match

1.19 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 13/141.14 xG/match

1.41 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 13/14▲1.14 xG/match

10.1 shots/matchShotsseason · 15/16▲11.5 shots/match

13.1 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 15/16▲11.6 shots/match

3.8 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 15/16▲4.06 shots/match

5.27 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 15/16▲4.44 shots/match

50.2%Possessionseason · 15/1647.1%

3.87 corners/matchCornersseason · 15/165.56 corners/match

5.6 corners/match▲Corners allowedseason · 15/165.94 corners/match

3 cards/matchCardsseason · 4/42 cards/match

11.1 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 15/1612.4 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

27%▲Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 15/1619%

73%Scoring frequencyseason · 15/16▲81%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

New England Revolution51.7

Toronto FC28.3

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

New England Revolution17.2

Toronto FC25

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

New England Revolution49.4

Toronto FC56.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

New England Revolution15

Toronto FC31.7

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

New England Revolution56.7

Toronto FC43.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 63%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

New England Revolution11.7

Toronto FC78.3

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

New England Revolution12.5

Toronto FC45.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches

0.8 goals/matchGoals scored5/50.8 goals/match

1.2 goals/match▲Goals allowed5/51.8 goals/match

0.97 xG/matchExpected goals5/51.01 xG/match

10.6 shots/matchShots5/5▲11.2 shots/match

3 shots/match▲Shots on target5/52.6 shots/match

57.2%Possession5/545.6%

6.6 corners/matchCorners5/54.6 corners/match

—Cards1/0—

9.8 fouls/matchFouls5/511 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches

1.1 goals/matchGoals scored10/10▲1.3 goals/match

0.9 goals/match▲Goals allowed10/101.9 goals/match

1.1 xG/matchExpected goals10/10▲1.17 xG/match

11.1 shots/matchShots10/1011.5 shots/match

3.7 shots/match▲Shots on target10/103.4 shots/match

53%Possession10/1048.6%

4.5 corners/matchCorners10/105.2 corners/match

—Cards1/1—

9.4 fouls/matchFouls10/1012.6 fouls/match

Window

Season

15 / 16 matches

1.47 goals/match▲Goals scored15/161.38 goals/match

1.2 goals/match▲Goals allowed15/161.81 goals/match

1.19 xG/matchExpected goals13/141.14 xG/match

10.1 shots/matchShots15/16▲11.5 shots/match

3.8 shots/matchShots on target15/16▲4.06 shots/match

50.2%Possession15/1647.1%

3.87 corners/matchCorners15/165.56 corners/match

3 cards/matchCards4/42 cards/match

11.1 fouls/matchFouls15/1612.4 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

9 / 7 matches

1.89 goals/match▲Goals scored9/70.71 goals/match

0.78 goals/match▲Goals allowed9/71.57 goals/match

1.21 xG/match▲Expected goals9/50.95 xG/match

11 shots/match▲Shots9/710.1 shots/match

4.11 shots/match▲Shots on target9/72.86 shots/match

52.9%Possession9/746.6%

4.44 corners/matchCorners9/74.86 corners/match

—Cards1/2—

10.7 fouls/matchFouls9/711.9 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

60 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/16 days

0 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/11 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready

Season samples15 / 16home / away teams

Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.

Analysis cutoff: Thu, 23 Jul 2026, 03:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match

Match statistics

What the record shows

New England Revolution's recent record differs from the season

New England Revolution show a distinct attacking-volume record

Values, percentiles and samples

How the teams compare

Possession control

Attacking volume

Defensive resistance

Directness proxy

Physicality

Set-piece relevance

Tempo and pressure proxy

Season, last 10 and last 5

Last 5

Last 10

Season

Home and away samples

Home team at home / away team away

Rest and recent workload

How much supports this analysis

Known unknowns

Related matches

Make a graphic from this match