Major League Soccer · 2026Sun, 8 Mar 2026, 01:30 UTCFull timeGeodis ParkFull-time recap
31Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricNashville SCMinnesota United FC
Shots15 shots/match14 shots/match
Shots on target6 shots/match3 shots/match
Possession58%42%
Corners5 corners/match2 corners/match
Fouls11 fouls/match10 fouls/match
Yellow cards1 cards/match1 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Nashville SC have recorded the higher season possession share. No second pattern clears the sample and coverage gates. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

Nashville SC have recorded the higher season possession share.

55.3%PossessionNashville SC · Minnesota United FC43.3%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.0 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricNashville SCMinnesota United FCBaseline
Possession55.3%43.3%49.3%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Nashville SC favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · Minnesota United FC in 0 · 14 too close

2.33 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 3/31.33 goals/match
0.67 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 3/31.67 goals/match
Expected goalsseason · 0/0
Expected goals allowedseason · 0/0
12 shots/matchShotsseason · 3/313.7 shots/match
9 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 3/312.7 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 3/34 shots/match
2 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 3/35.33 shots/match
55.3%Possessionseason · 3/343.3%
3.67 corners/matchCornersseason · 3/35 corners/match
2.67 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 3/38 corners/match
1.67 cards/matchCardsseason · 3/31.33 cards/match
14 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 3/311.7 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
33%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 3/333%
67%Scoring frequencyseason · 3/3100%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Nashville SC81.2
Minnesota United FC12.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Nashville SC62.5
Minnesota United FC54.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Nashville SC79.2
Minnesota United FC33.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Nashville SC27.1
Minnesota United FC97.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Nashville SC51
Minnesota United FC27.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Nashville SC20.8
Minnesota United FC45.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Nashville SC49.5
Minnesota United FC52.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

3 / 3 matches
2.33 goals/matchGoals scored3/31.33 goals/match
0.67 goals/matchGoals allowed3/31.67 goals/match
Expected goals0/0
12 shots/matchShots3/313.7 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on target3/34 shots/match
55.3%Possession3/343.3%
3.67 corners/matchCorners3/35 corners/match
1.67 cards/matchCards3/31.33 cards/match
14 fouls/matchFouls3/311.7 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

3 / 3 matches
2.33 goals/matchGoals scored3/31.33 goals/match
0.67 goals/matchGoals allowed3/31.67 goals/match
Expected goals0/0
12 shots/matchShots3/313.7 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on target3/34 shots/match
55.3%Possession3/343.3%
3.67 corners/matchCorners3/35 corners/match
1.67 cards/matchCards3/31.33 cards/match
14 fouls/matchFouls3/311.7 fouls/match

Window

Season

3 / 3 matches
2.33 goals/matchGoals scored3/31.33 goals/match
0.67 goals/matchGoals allowed3/31.67 goals/match
Expected goals0/0
12 shots/matchShots3/313.7 shots/match
5 shots/matchShots on target3/34 shots/match
55.3%Possession3/343.3%
3.67 corners/matchCorners3/35 corners/match
1.67 cards/matchCards3/31.33 cards/match
14 fouls/matchFouls3/311.7 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

2 / 2 matches
Goals scored2/2
Goals allowed2/2
Expected goals0/0
Shots2/2
Shots on target2/2
Possession2/2
Corners2/2
Cards2/2
Fouls2/2

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/17.17 days
2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited
Season samples3 / 3home / away teams
Recent samples3 / 3last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Sun, 8 Mar 2026, 05:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match