Sheffield Wednesday
League One · 2026Sheffield Wednesday vs AFC Wimbledon · League One
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 2.17–0.71
- Expected goals
- 2.12–0.87
- Shots
- 16.3–11
- Possession
- 55.3%–46.6%
30-second read
What the record shows
The story here is recent context rather than season averages: AFC Wimbledon's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. Alongside it: sheffield Wednesday have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
AFC Wimbledon's recent record differs from the season
moderateAFC Wimbledon's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1 goal/match | 0.71 goals/match | 1.67 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
AFC Wimbledon have a visible away split
weakAFC Wimbledon's away-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 12.7 shots/match | 11 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Sheffield Wednesday show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakSheffield Wednesday's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Sheffield Wednesday | AFC Wimbledon | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 16.3 shots/match | 11 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
| Shots against | 12.3 shots/match | 12.9 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Sheffield Wednesday favored in 8 of 13 directional metrics · AFC Wimbledon in 1 · 4 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Sheffield Wednesday / AFC Wimbledon
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
More football
Related matches
Mansfield Town
Wycombe Wanderers
Wigan Athletic
ReadingTeam rankings in League One
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.