West Ham United
Championship · 2026West Ham United vs Queens Park Rangers · Championship
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 2.86–1.14
- Expected goals
- 2.12–1.41
- Shots
- 15.9–14.9
- Possession
- 55.9%–49.1%
30-second read
What the record shows
The retained record does not give either club a clear edge on the metrics that clear the gates. The closest thing to a difference: west Ham United's home-only shot average is above their full-season average. Limitation: At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
West Ham United have a visible home split
weakWest Ham United's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 19 shots/match | 15.9 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
West Ham United's recent record differs from the season
weakWest Ham United's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 3.4 goals/match | 2.86 goals/match | 1.27 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Both teams have elevated corners records
weakEach team's season corners average is above the competition baseline.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Both team averages are compared with the same competition baseline.
Window: season
| Metric | West Ham United | Queens Park Rangers | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corners | 6 corners/match | 6.43 corners/match | 5.41 corners/match |
Caveat: A shared historical pattern is descriptive and may not repeat in one fixture.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: West Ham United favored in 7 of 13 directional metrics · Queens Park Rangers in 4 · 2 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
West Ham United / Queens Park Rangers
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
More football
Related matches
Lincoln City
Derby County
Charlton Athletic
Bristol City
West Bromwich Albion
Birmingham CityTeam rankings in Championship
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.