Sheffield Wednesday
League One · 2026Sheffield Wednesday vs Cambridge United · League One
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 2.17–1.83
- Expected goals
- 2.12–0.94
- Shots
- 16.3–10.7
- Possession
- 55.3%–44.8%
30-second read
What the record shows
One pattern stands out in the record: sheffield Wednesday's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. The next-strongest reading is weaker: sheffield Wednesday have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Cambridge United have a visible away split
weakCambridge United's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 8.67 shots/match | 10.7 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Sheffield Wednesday show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateSheffield Wednesday's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Sheffield Wednesday | Cambridge United | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 16.3 shots/match | 10.7 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
| Shots against | 12.3 shots/match | 14 shots/match | 12.9 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateSheffield Wednesday have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 10.5 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Sheffield Wednesday | Cambridge United | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 55.3% | 44.8% | 49.7% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Sheffield Wednesday favored in 11 of 13 directional metrics · Cambridge United in 2
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Rest before fixture · Both teams: 21 days
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Sheffield Wednesday / Cambridge United
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
More football
Related matches
Stevenage
AFC Wimbledon
Peterborough United
Luton Town
Doncaster RoversTeam rankings in League One
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.