Stevenage vs Sheffield Wednesday · League One
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1.83–2.17
- Expected goals
- 0.94–2.12
- Shots
- 9.67–16.3
- Possession
- 42.3%–55.3%
30-second read
What the record shows
One pattern stands out in the record: stevenage's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. The next-strongest reading is weaker: sheffield Wednesday have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Stevenage show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateStevenage's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Stevenage | Sheffield Wednesday | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 9.67 shots/match | 16.3 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
| Shots against | 11.7 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match | 13 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateSheffield Wednesday have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 13.0 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Stevenage | Sheffield Wednesday | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 42.3% | 55.3% | 49.7% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Stevenage favored in 5 of 13 directional metrics · Sheffield Wednesday in 7 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Stevenage / Sheffield Wednesday
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The recorded fixture status indicates that timing or completion is uncertain.
Team rankings in League One
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.
Stevenage
Leyton Orient
Stockport County
Wycombe Wanderers
Reading
Cambridge United
AFC Wimbledon