Premier League · 2023Sat, 26 Aug 2023, 14:00 UTCFull timeFull-time recap
22Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricArsenalFulham
Shots19 shots/match8 shots/match
Shots on target11 shots/match3 shots/match
Expected goals3.2 xG/match0.56 xG/match
Possession71%29%
Corners8 corners/match3 corners/match
Fouls6 fouls/match5 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Saša Lukić · Fulham · 24′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedMartin Ødegaard · Arsenal · 58′ · 0.02 xG · on targetEddie Nketiah · Arsenal · 90′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedHarry Wilson · Fulham · 26′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedMartin Ødegaard · Arsenal · 44′ · 0.03 xG · on targetAndreas Pereira · Fulham · 1′ · 0.04 xG · goalWilliam Saliba · Arsenal · 19′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedJoão Palhinha · Fulham · 24′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedGabriel Martinelli · Arsenal · 32′ · 0.04 xG · on targetBukayo Saka · Arsenal · 48′ · 0.04 xG · on targetFábio Vieira · Arsenal · 90′ · 0.04 xG · on targetRaúl Jiménez · Fulham · 23′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedMartin Ødegaard · Arsenal · 61′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedRaúl Jiménez · Fulham · 22′ · 0.07 xG · off target or blockedEddie Nketiah · Arsenal · 90′ · 0.07 xG · off target or blockedEddie Nketiah · Arsenal · 90′ · 0.07 xG · off target or blockedGabriel Martinelli · Arsenal · 18′ · 0.09 xG · on targetGabriel Martinelli · Arsenal · 40′ · 0.09 xG · on targetJoão Palhinha · Fulham · 87′ · 0.11 xG · goalGabriel Jesus · Arsenal · 90′ · 0.15 xG · on targetAdama Traoré · Fulham · 90′ · 0.20 xG · on targetGabriel Martinelli · Arsenal · 19′ · 0.23 xG · off target or blockedEddie Nketiah · Arsenal · 72′ · 0.26 xG · goalKai Havertz · Arsenal · 11′ · 0.28 xG · off target or blockedJakub Kiwior · Arsenal · 90′ · 0.40 xG · off target or blockedBukayo Saka · Arsenal · 31′ · 0.55 xG · off target or blockedBukayo Saka · Arsenal · 70′ · 0.82 xG · goal
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Arsenal: 19 shots, 10 on target, 3.29 xG. Fulham: 8 shots, 3 on target, 0.56 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

01.753.50′HT90′Bukayo Saka · Arsenal · 70′Eddie Nketiah · Arsenal · 72′Andreas Pereira · Fulham · 1′João Palhinha · Fulham · 87′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Arsenal 3.29 xG · Fulham 0.56 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Fulham's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. A second useful context is: Arsenal have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

Fulham show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Fulham's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

16 shots/matchShotsArsenal · Fulham9 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricArsenalFulhamBaseline
Shots16 shots/match9 shots/match15.3 shots/match
Shots against9.33 shots/match18.3 shots/match14.3 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

Arsenal have recorded the higher season possession share.

67.3%PossessionArsenal · Fulham47.7%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 19.7 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricArsenalFulhamBaseline
Possession67.3%47.7%49.3%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.

2Arsenal
0Draws
0Fulham
FulhamArsenal · Premier League03
ArsenalFulham · Premier League21

Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages · sample sizes shown with each metric. Context, not a forecast.

Where the edge is

Arsenal favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Fulham in 0 · 13 too close

1.67 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 3/31 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 3/31.67 goals/match
2.02 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 3/30.84 xG/match
0.92 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 3/33.29 xG/match
16 shots/matchShotsseason · 3/39 shots/match
9.33 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 3/318.3 shots/match
7 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 3/32.33 shots/match
2.33 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 3/39.33 shots/match
67.3%Possessionseason · 3/347.7%
8 corners/matchCornersseason · 3/34 corners/match
2.33 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 3/37.67 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
9.33 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 3/38 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
33%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 3/333%
100%Scoring frequencyseason · 3/367%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Arsenal80.8
Fulham42.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Arsenal68
Fulham14.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Arsenal85.9
Fulham19.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Arsenal19.2
Fulham3.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Arsenal15.4
Fulham3.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Arsenal80.8
Fulham23.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Arsenal60.6
Fulham8.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Season

Arsenal3 matchesFulham3 matches
1.67 goals/matchGoals scored3/31 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowed3/31.67 goals/match
2.02 xG/matchExpected goals3/30.84 xG/match
16 shots/matchShots3/39 shots/match
7 shots/matchShots on target3/32.33 shots/match
67.3%Possession3/347.7%
8 corners/matchCorners3/34 corners/match
Cards0/0
9.33 fouls/matchFouls3/38 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

Arsenal2 matchesFulham2 matches
Goals scored2/2
Goals allowed2/2
Expected goals2/2
Shots2/2
Shots on target2/2
Possession2/2
Corners2/2
Cards0/0
Fouls2/2

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

4.79 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/17 days
1 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited
Season samples3 / 3home / away teams
Recent samples3 / 3last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 26 Aug 2023, 18:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match