Crystal Palace
Premier League · 2023Crystal Palace 3–2 Wolverhampton · Premier League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Crystal Palace won 3–2.
- Shots
- 16–12
- Shots on target
- 11–4
- Expected goals
- 2.11–1.18
- Possession
- 43%–57%
Full time
What the match recorded
Crystal Palace beat Wolverhampton 3–2. Recorded in this match (Crystal Palace – Wolverhampton): shots 16–12, shots on target 11–4, expected goals 2.11–1.18, possession 43%–57%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Both teams have elevated fouls records
weakEach team's season fouls average is above the competition baseline.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Both team averages are compared with the same competition baseline.
Window: season
| Metric | Crystal Palace | Wolverhampton | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fouls | 13 fouls/match | 12.5 fouls/match | 11.1 fouls/match |
Caveat: A shared historical pattern is descriptive and may not repeat in one fixture.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Crystal Palace: 16 shots, 10 on target, 2.15 xG. Wolverhampton: 12 shots, 4 on target, 1.18 xG.
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Crystal Palace 2.15 xG · Wolverhampton 1.18 xG.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Crystal Palace favored in 0 of 11 directional metrics · Wolverhampton in 0 · 11 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Rest before fixture · Both teams: 7.96 days
Crystal Palace / Wolverhampton
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Brentford
Everton
Liverpool
Aston Villa
Arsenal
Manchester UnitedTeam rankings in Premier League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.