Premier League · 2024Sat, 28 Sept 2024, 16:30 UTCFull timeFull-time recap
12Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricWolverhamptonLiverpool
Shots8 shots/match10 shots/match
Shots on target3 shots/match6 shots/match
Expected goals0.63 xG/match2.54 xG/match
Possession45%55%
Corners2 corners/match10 corners/match
Fouls16 fouls/match8 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Mario Lemina · Wolverhampton · 45′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedNélson Semedo · Wolverhampton · 76′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedTrent Alexander-Arnold · Liverpool · 40′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedMatheus Cunha · Wolverhampton · 68′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedMatheus Cunha · Wolverhampton · 22′ · 0.03 xG · on targetJean-Ricner Bellegarde · Wolverhampton · 5′ · 0.04 xG · on targetJørgen Strand Larsen · Wolverhampton · 15′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedMohamed Salah · Liverpool · 65′ · 0.04 xG · on targetIbrahima Konaté · Liverpool · 83′ · 0.06 xG · off target or blockedTrent Alexander-Arnold · Liverpool · 32′ · 0.07 xG · on targetCurtis Jones · Liverpool · 78′ · 0.09 xG · on targetIbrahima Konaté · Liverpool · 45′ · 0.11 xG · goalCarlos Forbs · Wolverhampton · 72′ · 0.11 xG · off target or blockedLuis Díaz · Liverpool · 26′ · 0.12 xG · off target or blockedRayan Aït-Nouri · Wolverhampton · 56′ · 0.36 xG · goalMohamed Salah · Liverpool · 50′ · 0.51 xG · off target or blockedDominik Szoboszlai · Liverpool · 40′ · 0.72 xG · on targetMohamed Salah · Liverpool · 61′ · 0.82 xG · goal
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Wolverhampton: 8 shots, 3 on target, 0.62 xG. Liverpool: 10 shots, 6 on target, 2.56 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

01.530′HT90′Rayan Aït-Nouri · Wolverhampton · 56′Ibrahima Konaté · Liverpool · 45′Mohamed Salah · Liverpool · 61′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Wolverhampton 0.62 xG · Liverpool 2.56 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Wolverhampton's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. A second useful context is: Wolverhampton's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

Wolverhampton show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Wolverhampton's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

10.3 shots/matchShotsWolverhampton · Liverpool15.2 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricWolverhamptonLiverpoolBaseline
Shots10.3 shots/match15.2 shots/match13 shots/match
Shots against13.5 shots/match9.17 shots/match13.5 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Wolverhampton's recent record differs from the season

weak

Wolverhampton's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

1.2 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for1.2 goals/match1 goals/match1.33 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

The teams have contrasting possession records

moderate

Liverpool have recorded the higher season possession share.

46%PossessionWolverhampton · Liverpool59%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 13.0 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricWolverhamptonLiverpoolBaseline
Possession46%59%48.9%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.

1Wolverhampton
0Draws
4Liverpool
LiverpoolWolverhampton · Premier League20
WolverhamptonLiverpool · Premier League13
LiverpoolWolverhampton · Premier League20
WolverhamptonLiverpool · Premier League30
LiverpoolWolverhampton · Premier League31

Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages · sample sizes shown with each metric. Context, not a forecast.

Where the edge is

Wolverhampton favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Liverpool in 10 · 3 too close

1 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 6/62 goals/match
2.67 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 6/60.33 goals/match
0.92 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 6/62.11 xG/match
1.63 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 6/60.75 xG/match
10.3 shots/matchShotsseason · 6/615.2 shots/match
13.5 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 6/69.17 shots/match
3.67 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 6/66.67 shots/match
5.83 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 6/63.17 shots/match
46%Possessionseason · 6/659%
3.5 corners/matchCornersseason · 6/66.83 corners/match
7.17 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 6/64 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
15.7 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 6/611.3 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
0%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 6/667%
83%Scoring frequencyseason · 6/683%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Wolverhampton40
Liverpool77.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Wolverhampton24.2
Liverpool80
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Wolverhampton26.7
Liverpool90.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Wolverhampton22.5
Liverpool47.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Wolverhampton97.5
Liverpool37.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Wolverhampton7.5
Liverpool87.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Wolverhampton37.5
Liverpool70.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Season

Wolverhampton6 matchesLiverpool6 matches
1 goals/matchGoals scored6/62 goals/match
2.67 goals/matchGoals allowed6/60.33 goals/match
0.92 xG/matchExpected goals6/62.11 xG/match
10.3 shots/matchShots6/615.2 shots/match
3.67 shots/matchShots on target6/66.67 shots/match
46%Possession6/659%
3.5 corners/matchCorners6/66.83 corners/match
Cards0/0
15.7 fouls/matchFouls6/611.3 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

Wolverhampton3 matchesLiverpool3 matches
1.33 goals/matchGoals scored3/32.33 goals/match
3.33 goals/matchGoals allowed3/30.33 goals/match
1.27 xG/matchExpected goals3/32.33 xG/match
10.7 shots/matchShots3/313 shots/match
4 shots/matchShots on target3/34.67 shots/match
44.7%Possession3/354.7%
3.67 corners/matchCorners3/37.33 corners/match
Cards0/0
15.3 fouls/matchFouls3/311 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7.1 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/17.1 days
2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/11 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade B · Useful evidencelimited
Season samples6 / 6home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 28 Sept 2024, 20:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match