Premier League · 2024Sat, 30 Nov 2024, 15:00 UTCFull timeFull-time recap
10Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricNottingham ForestIpswich Town
Shots12 shots/match7 shots/match
Shots on target5 shots/match3 shots/match
Expected goals1.68 xG/match0.59 xG/match
Possession45%55%
Corners8 corners/match7 corners/match
Fouls5 fouls/match16 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Jack Taylor · Ipswich Town · 84′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedNeco Williams · Nottingham Forest · 35′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedMorgan Gibbs-White · Nottingham Forest · 60′ · 0.03 xG · on targetCameron Burgess · Ipswich Town · 86′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedMorgan Gibbs-White · Nottingham Forest · 1′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedLiam Delap · Ipswich Town · 4′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedNikola Milenković · Nottingham Forest · 7′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedRyan Yates · Nottingham Forest · 90′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedMorgan Gibbs-White · Nottingham Forest · 29′ · 0.06 xG · on targetOmari Hutchinson · Ipswich Town · 33′ · 0.06 xG · on targetCallum Hudson Odoi · Nottingham Forest · 46′ · 0.06 xG · off target or blockedJota Silva · Nottingham Forest · 26′ · 0.08 xG · off target or blockedCameron Burgess · Ipswich Town · 84′ · 0.10 xG · off target or blockedRyan Yates · Nottingham Forest · 7′ · 0.14 xG · off target or blockedJack Clarke · Ipswich Town · 69′ · 0.14 xG · on targetCallum Hudson Odoi · Nottingham Forest · 7′ · 0.16 xG · on targetCameron Burgess · Ipswich Town · 23′ · 0.21 xG · on targetMurillo · Nottingham Forest · 54′ · 0.21 xG · on targetChris Wood · Nottingham Forest · 49′ · 0.82 xG · goal
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Nottingham Forest: 12 shots, 5 on target, 1.71 xG. Ipswich Town: 7 shots, 3 on target, 0.60 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

0120′HT90′Chris Wood · Nottingham Forest · 49′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Nottingham Forest 1.71 xG · Ipswich Town 0.60 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Ipswich Town's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Ipswich Town's away-only shot average is below their full-season average. Limitation: The fixture is outside the configured active season.

Ipswich Town's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Ipswich Town's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

1.4 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for1.4 goals/match1 goals/match1.48 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Ipswich Town have a visible away split

moderate

Ipswich Town's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.

7.86 shots/matchShotsAway only · Season9.69 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: away

MetricAway onlySeasonBaseline
Shots7.86 shots/match9.69 shots/match13.6 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Ipswich Town show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Ipswich Town's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

13.5 shots/matchShotsNottingham Forest · Ipswich Town9.69 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricNottingham ForestIpswich TownBaseline
Shots13.5 shots/match9.69 shots/match13.6 shots/match
Shots against13.2 shots/match14.9 shots/match12.8 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages · sample sizes shown with each metric. Context, not a forecast.

Where the edge is

Nottingham Forest favored in 10 of 13 directional metrics · Ipswich Town in 0 · 3 too close

1.23 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 13/131 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 13/131.85 goals/match
1.28 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 13/130.95 xG/match
1.01 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 13/132.09 xG/match
13.5 shots/matchShotsseason · 13/139.69 shots/match
13.2 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 13/1314.9 shots/match
4.77 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 13/133.23 shots/match
4 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 13/135.85 shots/match
41.4%Possessionseason · 13/1341.6%
5.15 corners/matchCornersseason · 13/135 corners/match
6.38 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 13/136.31 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
10.7 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 13/1312.8 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
38%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 13/138%
85%Scoring frequencyseason · 13/1369%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Nottingham Forest7.5
Ipswich Town12.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Nottingham Forest43.3
Ipswich Town12.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Nottingham Forest68.3
Ipswich Town20
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Nottingham Forest92.5
Ipswich Town17.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Nottingham Forest12.5
Ipswich Town87.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Nottingham Forest45
Ipswich Town37.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Nottingham Forest38.1
Ipswich Town36.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Season

Nottingham Forest13 matchesIpswich Town13 matches
1.23 goals/matchGoals scored13/131 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowed13/131.85 goals/match
1.28 xG/matchExpected goals13/130.95 xG/match
13.5 shots/matchShots13/139.69 shots/match
4.77 shots/matchShots on target13/133.23 shots/match
41.4%Possession13/1341.6%
5.15 corners/matchCorners13/135 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.7 fouls/matchFouls13/1312.8 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

Nottingham Forest7 matchesIpswich Town7 matches
1.14 goals/matchGoals scored7/71.14 goals/match
0.86 goals/matchGoals allowed7/72.14 goals/match
1.34 xG/matchExpected goals7/70.93 xG/match
14.4 shots/matchShots7/77.86 shots/match
4.86 shots/matchShots on target7/73 shots/match
48.3%Possession7/739%
6.14 corners/matchCorners7/74.57 corners/match
Cards0/0
11 fouls/matchFouls7/714 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/15.94 days
1 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/11 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidencelimited
Season samples13 / 13home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • The fixture is outside the configured active season.
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 30 Nov 2024, 19:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match