Nottingham Forest
Premier League · 2024Nottingham Forest 1–0 Ipswich Town · Premier League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Nottingham Forest won 1–0.
- Shots
- 12–7
- Shots on target
- 5–3
- Expected goals
- 1.68–0.59
- Possession
- 45%–55%
Full time
What the match recorded
Nottingham Forest beat Ipswich Town 1–0. Recorded in this match (Nottingham Forest – Ipswich Town): shots 12–7, shots on target 5–3, expected goals 1.68–0.59, possession 45%–55%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Ipswich Town's recent record differs from the season
moderateIpswich Town's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1.4 goals/match | 1 goal/match | 1.48 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Ipswich Town have a visible away split
moderateIpswich Town's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 7.86 shots/match | 9.69 shots/match | 13.6 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Ipswich Town show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakIpswich Town's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Nottingham Forest | Ipswich Town | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 13.5 shots/match | 9.69 shots/match | 13.6 shots/match |
| Shots against | 13.2 shots/match | 14.9 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Nottingham Forest: 12 shots, 5 on target, 1.71 xG. Ipswich Town: 7 shots, 3 on target, 0.60 xG.
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Nottingham Forest 1.71 xG · Ipswich Town 0.60 xG.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Nottingham Forest favored in 10 of 11 directional metrics · Ipswich Town in 0 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 1 match
Nottingham Forest / Ipswich Town
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- The fixture is outside the configured active season.
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Manchester City
Crystal Palace
Wolverhampton
Bournemouth
Newcastle UnitedTeam rankings in Premier League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.