Wrexham
Championship · 2025Wrexham 2–2 Sheffield Wednesday · Championship
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Wrexham and Sheffield Wednesday drew 2–2.
- Shots
- 11–21
- Shots on target
- 4–7
- Expected goals
- 1.3–2.67
- Possession
- 47%–53%
Full time
What the match recorded
Wrexham and Sheffield Wednesday drew 2–2. Recorded in this match (Wrexham – Sheffield Wednesday): shots 11–21, shots on target 4–7, expected goals 1.3–2.67, possession 47%–53%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Sheffield Wednesday show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakSheffield Wednesday's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Wrexham | Sheffield Wednesday | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 12 shots/match | 14.3 shots/match | 12 shots/match |
| Shots against | 21.7 shots/match | 16.7 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Wrexham: 11 shots, 4 on target, 1.32 xG. Sheffield Wednesday: 21 shots, 7 on target, 2.72 xG.
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Wrexham 1.32 xG · Sheffield Wednesday 2.72 xG.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Wrexham favored in 0 of 11 directional metrics · Sheffield Wednesday in 0 · 11 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Wrexham / Sheffield Wednesday
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Millwall
Swansea City
Birmingham City
Oxford United
West Bromwich Albion
PortsmouthTeam rankings in Championship
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.