Premier League · 2025Sat, 30 Aug 2025, 11:30 UTCFull timeStamford BridgeFull-time recap
20Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricChelseaFulham
Shots13 shots/match11 shots/match
Shots on target6 shots/match3 shots/match
Possession54%46%
Corners6 corners/match4 corners/match
Fouls11 fouls/match17 fouls/match
Yellow cards2 cards/match2 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Each team's season corners average is above the competition baseline. A second useful context is: Chelsea's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

Both teams have elevated corners records

weak

Each team's season corners average is above the competition baseline.

7.33 corners/matchCornersChelsea · Fulham5.33 corners/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Both team averages are compared with the same competition baseline.

Window: season

MetricChelseaFulhamBaseline
Corners7.33 corners/match5.33 corners/match3.67 corners/match

Caveat: A shared historical pattern is descriptive and may not repeat in one fixture.

Chelsea show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Chelsea's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

14.7 shots/matchShotsChelsea · Fulham10.3 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricChelseaFulhamBaseline
Shots14.7 shots/match10.3 shots/match10.3 shots/match
Shots against11.3 shots/match11 shots/match12.2 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

Chelsea have recorded the higher season possession share.

61.7%PossessionChelsea · Fulham49.3%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.3 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricChelseaFulhamBaseline
Possession61.7%49.3%48.3%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages · sample sizes shown with each metric. Context, not a forecast.

Where the edge is

Chelsea favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Fulham in 0 · 13 too close

2.33 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 3/30.67 goals/match
0.33 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 3/31.33 goals/match
Expected goalsseason · 0/0
Expected goals allowedseason · 0/0
14.7 shots/matchShotsseason · 3/310.3 shots/match
11.3 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 3/311 shots/match
5.33 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 3/33 shots/match
3.67 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 3/34.33 shots/match
61.7%Possessionseason · 3/349.3%
7.33 corners/matchCornersseason · 3/35.33 corners/match
4.33 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 3/35.33 corners/match
1.67 cards/matchCardsseason · 3/32 cards/match
10.3 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 3/314.7 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
67%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 3/30%
67%Scoring frequencyseason · 3/367%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Chelsea95
Fulham55
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Chelsea88.3
Fulham33.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Chelsea68.3
Fulham43.3
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Chelsea65
Fulham35
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Chelsea40
Fulham77.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Chelsea85
Fulham70
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Chelsea75
Fulham62.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Season

Chelsea3 matchesFulham3 matches
2.33 goals/matchGoals scored3/30.67 goals/match
0.33 goals/matchGoals allowed3/31.33 goals/match
Expected goals0/0
14.7 shots/matchShots3/310.3 shots/match
5.33 shots/matchShots on target3/33 shots/match
61.7%Possession3/349.3%
7.33 corners/matchCorners3/35.33 corners/match
1.67 cards/matchCards3/32 cards/match
10.3 fouls/matchFouls3/314.7 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

Chelsea2 matchesFulham2 matches
Goals scored2/2
Goals allowed2/2
Expected goals0/0
Shots2/2
Shots on target2/2
Possession2/2
Corners2/2
Cards2/2
Fouls2/2

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7.69 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/15.83 days
2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited
Season samples3 / 3home / away teams
Recent samples3 / 3last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 30 Aug 2025, 15:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match