League One · 2026Notts County vs Stockport County · League One
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1–2.22
- Expected goals
- 1.15–1.82
- Shots
- 12–16.6
- Possession
- 45.8%–58.8%
30-second read
What the record shows
The story here is recent context rather than season averages: notts County's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. Alongside it: notts County's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Notts County's recent record differs from the season
moderateNotts County's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 0.6 goals/match | 1 goal/match | 1.47 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Stockport County have a visible away split
weakStockport County's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 13.5 shots/match | 16.6 shots/match | 13.4 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Notts County show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateNotts County's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Notts County | Stockport County | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 12 shots/match | 16.6 shots/match | 13.4 shots/match |
| Shots against | 12.1 shots/match | 10.1 shots/match | 12.9 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Notts County favored in 1 of 13 directional metrics · Stockport County in 10 · 2 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Notts County / Stockport County
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
More football
Related matches
Sheffield Wednesday
Oxford United
Doncaster Rovers
Stevenage
Milton Keynes DonsTeam rankings in League One
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.