Nottingham Forest vs Arsenal · Premier League
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1–2
- Expected goals
- 1.38–1.73
- Shots
- 14.5–13.5
- Possession
- 43.3%–59.5%
30-second read
What the record shows
The retained record does not give either club a clear edge on the metrics that clear the gates. The closest thing to a difference: arsenal have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
The teams have contrasting possession records
weakArsenal have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 16.2 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Nottingham Forest | Arsenal | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 43.3% | 59.5% | 47.7% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Nottingham Forest show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakNottingham Forest's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Nottingham Forest | Arsenal | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 14.5 shots/match | 13.5 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
| Shots against | 10.8 shots/match | 9 shots/match | 13.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Nottingham Forest favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Arsenal in 0 · 13 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Nottingham Forest / Arsenal
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
- At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
- The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
Team rankings in Premier League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.
Nottingham Forest
Ipswich Town
FC Bayern München
Leeds United
Manchester United
Brighton & Hove Albion
Crystal Palace