VfL Osnabrück vs SG Dynamo Dresden · 2. Bundesliga
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1.5–1.33
- Expected goals
- 1.55–1.21
- Shots
- 14.3–12.7
- Possession
- 41.8%–55%
30-second read
What the record shows
One pattern stands out in the record: SG Dynamo Dresden have recorded the higher season possession share. The next-strongest reading is weaker: SG Dynamo Dresden's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
SG Dynamo Dresden's recent record differs from the season
weakSG Dynamo Dresden's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1.6 goals/match | 1.33 goals/match | 1.5 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateSG Dynamo Dresden have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 13.2 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | VfL Osnabrück | SG Dynamo Dresden | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 41.8% | 55% | 49.5% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: VfL Osnabrück favored in 7 of 13 directional metrics · SG Dynamo Dresden in 4 · 2 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
VfL Osnabrück / SG Dynamo Dresden
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
Team rankings in 2. Bundesliga
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Arminia Bielefeld
1. FC Magdeburg
Hannover 96
Darmstadt 98
Energie Cottbus