Tottenham Hotspur
UEFA Champions League · 2025Tottenham Hotspur 4–0 FC København · UEFA Champions League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Tottenham Hotspur won 4–0.
- Shots
- 14–12
- Shots on target
- 6–4
- Expected goals
- 3.32–0.35
- Possession
- 61%–39%
Full time
What the match recorded
Tottenham Hotspur beat FC København 4–0. Recorded in this match (Tottenham Hotspur – FC København): shots 14–12, shots on target 6–4, expected goals 3.32–0.35, possession 61%–39%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
FC København's recent record differs from the season
weakFC København's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1.2 goals/match | 1.5 goals/match | 1.67 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Tottenham Hotspur show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakTottenham Hotspur's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Tottenham Hotspur | FC København | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10.5 shots/match | 11.6 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
| Shots against | 15.8 shots/match | 10.7 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Tottenham Hotspur: 14 shots, 6 on target, 3.36 xG. FC København: 12 shots, 4 on target, 0.36 xG.
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Tottenham Hotspur 3.36 xG · FC København 0.36 xG.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Tottenham Hotspur favored in 0 of 11 directional metrics · FC København in 0 · 11 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Tottenham Hotspur / FC København
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Chelsea
Premier League
Olympiacos FC
PSV Eindhoven
Bodø/Glimt
AS Monaco
Atlético Madrid
Royale Union Saint-GilloiseTeam rankings in UEFA Champions League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.