Eliteserien · 2026Sun, 12 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTCFull timeKFUM ArenaFull-time recap

KFUM Oslo

DLLWD

0–2Full-time recap

Bodo/Glimt

LWWWD

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	KFUM Oslo	Bodo/Glimt
Shots	11 shots/match	14 shots/match▲
Shots on target	2 shots/match	6 shots/match▲
Expected goals	1.02 xG/match	1.76 xG/match▲
Possession	48%	52%
Corners	6 corners/match	4 corners/match
Fouls	10 fouls/match	9 fouls/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: KFUM Oslo's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. A second useful context is: KFUM Oslo's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. Limitation: Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

KFUM Oslo's recent record differs from the season

moderate

KFUM Oslo's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.

0.6 goals/match▲Goals forLast 5 · Season1 goals/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

Metric	Last 5	Season	Baseline
Goals for	0.6 goals/match	1 goals/match	1.33 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

KFUM Oslo show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

KFUM Oslo's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

10.9 shots/match▲ShotsKFUM Oslo · Bodo/Glimt16.6 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

Metric	KFUM Oslo	Bodo/Glimt	Baseline
Shots	10.9 shots/match	16.6 shots/match	12.3 shots/match
Shots against	12.3 shots/match	8.83 shots/match	13.1 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Bodo/Glimt have a visible away split

moderate

Bodo/Glimt's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.

13 shots/match▲ShotsAway only · Season16.6 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: away

Metric	Away only	Season	Baseline
Shots	13 shots/match	16.6 shots/match	12.3 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

KFUM Oslo favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · Bodo/Glimt in 11 · 3 too close

1 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 12/12▲2.5 goals/match

1.58 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 12/12▲0.92 goals/match

1.11 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 12/12▲2.21 xG/match

1.47 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 12/12▲1.06 xG/match

10.9 shots/matchShotsseason · 12/12▲16.6 shots/match

12.3 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 12/12▲8.83 shots/match

4.08 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 12/12▲6.67 shots/match

4.75 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 12/12▲3.42 shots/match

46.4%Possessionseason · 12/1264.9%

4.17 corners/matchCornersseason · 12/126.67 corners/match

4.67 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 12/12▲2.33 corners/match

2.75 cards/matchCardsseason · 4/1—

12.2 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 12/129.17 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

33%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 12/12▲50%

67%Scoring frequencyseason · 12/12▲83%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

KFUM Oslo28.1

Bodo/Glimt96.9

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

KFUM Oslo19.8

Bodo/Glimt94.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

KFUM Oslo53.1

Bodo/Glimt91.7

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

KFUM Oslo28.1

Bodo/Glimt53.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

KFUM Oslo73.5

Bodo/Glimt3.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 54%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

KFUM Oslo9.4

Bodo/Glimt90.6

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

KFUM Oslo31.2

Bodo/Glimt71.9

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches

0.6 goals/matchGoals scored5/5▲3.2 goals/match

1.2 goals/matchGoals allowed5/5▲0.8 goals/match

0.93 xG/matchExpected goals5/5▲2.18 xG/match

8.4 shots/matchShots5/5▲15.4 shots/match

3.2 shots/matchShots on target5/5▲7 shots/match

38.4%Possession5/563.8%

4.4 corners/matchCorners5/54.4 corners/match

—Cards2/1—

13.4 fouls/matchFouls5/510.4 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches

0.9 goals/matchGoals scored10/10▲2.7 goals/match

1.6 goals/matchGoals allowed10/10▲0.6 goals/match

1.08 xG/matchExpected goals10/10▲2.37 xG/match

10.3 shots/matchShots10/10▲17.9 shots/match

3.5 shots/matchShots on target10/10▲7.1 shots/match

43.2%Possession10/1063.5%

4.1 corners/matchCorners10/106.7 corners/match

2.75 cards/matchCards4/1—

12.2 fouls/matchFouls10/109.4 fouls/match

Window

Season

12 / 12 matches

1 goals/matchGoals scored12/12▲2.5 goals/match

1.58 goals/matchGoals allowed12/12▲0.92 goals/match

1.11 xG/matchExpected goals12/12▲2.21 xG/match

10.9 shots/matchShots12/12▲16.6 shots/match

4.08 shots/matchShots on target12/12▲6.67 shots/match

46.4%Possession12/1264.9%

4.17 corners/matchCorners12/126.67 corners/match

2.75 cards/matchCards4/1—

12.2 fouls/matchFouls12/129.17 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

7 / 7 matches

0.86 goals/matchGoals scored7/7▲2 goals/match

0.86 goals/match▲Goals allowed7/71.29 goals/match

1.03 xG/matchExpected goals7/7▲1.63 xG/match

10 shots/matchShots7/7▲13 shots/match

3.57 shots/matchShots on target7/7▲4.86 shots/match

45.9%Possession7/764.9%

5.14 corners/matchCorners7/75.43 corners/match

—Cards2/0—

13.3 fouls/matchFouls7/79.29 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

43.8 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/143.8 days

0 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/10 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready

Season samples12 / 12home / away teams

Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.

Analysis cutoff: Sun, 12 Jul 2026, 16:30 UTC · analysis-v4