Eliteserien · 2026Sat, 16 May 2026, 12:00 UTCFull timeBrann StadionFull-time recap

Brann

LLDWW

2–1Full-time recap

KFUM Oslo

DLWDL

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	Brann	KFUM Oslo
Shots	14 shots/match▲	6 shots/match
Shots on target	8 shots/match▲	2 shots/match
Expected goals	1.87 xG/match▲	0.54 xG/match
Possession	75%	25%
Corners	6 corners/match	0 corners/match
Fouls	5 fouls/match	13 fouls/match
Yellow cards	1 cards/match▲	3 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: KFUM Oslo's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. A second useful context is: Brann have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

KFUM Oslo's recent record differs from the season

moderate

KFUM Oslo's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.

0.8 goals/match▲Goals forLast 5 · Season1.11 goals/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

Metric	Last 5	Season	Baseline
Goals for	0.8 goals/match	1.11 goals/match	1.29 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

The teams have contrasting possession records

moderate

Brann have recorded the higher season possession share.

58.7%▲PossessionBrann · KFUM Oslo47.2%

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 11.4 percentage points.

Window: season

Metric	Brann	KFUM Oslo	Baseline
Possession	58.7%	47.2%	48.8%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Brann favored in 8 of 14 directional metrics · KFUM Oslo in 2 · 4 too close

2.33 goals/match▲Goals scoredseason · 9/91.11 goals/match

1.44 goals/match▲Goals allowedseason · 9/91.89 goals/match

2.06 xG/match▲Expected goalsseason · 9/91.04 xG/match

1.45 xG/match▲Expected goals allowedseason · 9/91.57 xG/match

14.4 shots/match▲Shotsseason · 9/910.8 shots/match

13.1 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 9/9▲12 shots/match

5.56 shots/match▲Shots on targetseason · 9/93.89 shots/match

4.11 shots/match▲Shots on target allowedseason · 9/95 shots/match

58.7%Possessionseason · 9/947.2%

7 corners/matchCornersseason · 9/93.56 corners/match

5 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 9/95 corners/match

—Cardsseason · 1/42.75 cards/match

11.6 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 9/911.7 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

11%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 9/9▲22%

89%▲Scoring frequencyseason · 9/978%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Brann90.6

KFUM Oslo40.6

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Brann82.3

KFUM Oslo31.2

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Brann59.4

KFUM Oslo41.7

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Brann46.9

KFUM Oslo28.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Brann46.9

KFUM Oslo65.6

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 56%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Brann84.4

KFUM Oslo9.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Brann71.9

KFUM Oslo29.7

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches

2.6 goals/match▲Goals scored5/50.8 goals/match

1.2 goals/match▲Goals allowed5/52 goals/match

1.95 xG/match▲Expected goals5/50.76 xG/match

12.6 shots/match▲Shots5/58.6 shots/match

5.6 shots/match▲Shots on target5/52.6 shots/match

57.2%Possession5/539.8%

5.8 corners/matchCorners5/52.2 corners/match

—Cards1/42.75 cards/match

12.6 fouls/matchFouls5/512.8 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

9 / 9 matches

2.33 goals/match▲Goals scored9/91.11 goals/match

1.44 goals/match▲Goals allowed9/91.89 goals/match

2.06 xG/match▲Expected goals9/91.04 xG/match

14.4 shots/match▲Shots9/910.8 shots/match

5.56 shots/match▲Shots on target9/93.89 shots/match

58.7%Possession9/947.2%

7 corners/matchCorners9/93.56 corners/match

—Cards1/42.75 cards/match

11.6 fouls/matchFouls9/911.7 fouls/match

Window

Season

9 / 9 matches

2.33 goals/match▲Goals scored9/91.11 goals/match

1.44 goals/match▲Goals allowed9/91.89 goals/match

2.06 xG/match▲Expected goals9/91.04 xG/match

14.4 shots/match▲Shots9/910.8 shots/match

5.56 shots/match▲Shots on target9/93.89 shots/match

58.7%Possession9/947.2%

7 corners/matchCorners9/93.56 corners/match

—Cards1/42.75 cards/match

11.6 fouls/matchFouls9/911.7 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

4 / 5 matches

1.5 goals/match▲Goals scored4/51.2 goals/match

1.25 goals/match▲Goals allowed4/52.6 goals/match

1.98 xG/match▲Expected goals4/51.22 xG/match

15.5 shots/match▲Shots4/512.2 shots/match

4.75 shots/matchShots on target4/54.8 shots/match

65%Possession4/547.2%

6.5 corners/matchCorners4/52.8 corners/match

—Cards1/2—

9 fouls/matchFouls4/510.6 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

13.8 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/15.88 days

1 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade B · Useful evidencelimited

Season samples9 / 9home / away teams

Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.

Analysis cutoff: Sat, 16 May 2026, 16:00 UTC · analysis-v4