Eliteserien · 2026Sun, 10 May 2026, 15:00 UTCFull timeKFUM ArenaFull-time recap
02Full-time recap

Viking

WWWWW

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricKFUM OsloViking
Shots2 shots/match10 shots/match
Shots on target0 shots/match4 shots/match
Expected goals0.14 xG/match2.21 xG/match
Possession35%65%
Corners4 corners/match6 corners/match
Fouls13 fouls/match2 fouls/match
Yellow cards3 cards/match0 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: KFUM Oslo's home-only shot average is below their full-season average. A second useful context is: KFUM Oslo's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

KFUM Oslo have a visible home split

weak

KFUM Oslo's home-only shot average is below their full-season average.

9 shots/matchShotsHome only · Season11.4 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: home

MetricHome onlySeasonBaseline
Shots9 shots/match11.4 shots/match12.3 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

KFUM Oslo show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

KFUM Oslo's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

11.4 shots/matchShotsKFUM Oslo · Viking15.8 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricKFUM OsloVikingBaseline
Shots11.4 shots/match15.8 shots/match12.3 shots/match
Shots against11.8 shots/match9.63 shots/match13.6 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

KFUM Oslo favored in 1 of 14 directional metrics · Viking in 10 · 3 too close

1.13 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 8/82.63 goals/match
1.88 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 8/80.75 goals/match
1.1 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 8/82.23 xG/match
1.54 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 8/80.89 xG/match
11.4 shots/matchShotsseason · 8/815.8 shots/match
11.8 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 8/89.63 shots/match
4.13 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 8/85.88 shots/match
4.63 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 8/82.75 shots/match
50%Possessionseason · 8/849.9%
4 corners/matchCornersseason · 8/85.88 corners/match
4.88 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 8/86.13 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCardsseason · 3/32.33 cards/match
11.5 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 8/811.8 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
25%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 8/850%
75%Scoring frequencyseason · 8/8100%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

KFUM Oslo65.6
Viking59.4
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

KFUM Oslo38.5
Viking92.7
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

KFUM Oslo46.9
Viking93.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

KFUM Oslo9.4
Viking96.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

KFUM Oslo48.5
Viking51.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 69%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

KFUM Oslo18.8
Viking56.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

KFUM Oslo33.6
Viking72.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches
1 goals/matchGoals scored5/53 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowed5/50.6 goals/match
1.14 xG/matchExpected goals5/52.26 xG/match
10.8 shots/matchShots5/515.6 shots/match
3.6 shots/matchShots on target5/56.2 shots/match
44.2%Possession5/551.2%
2.8 corners/matchCorners5/55.6 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCards3/1
12.2 fouls/matchFouls5/59.4 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

8 / 8 matches
1.13 goals/matchGoals scored8/82.63 goals/match
1.88 goals/matchGoals allowed8/80.75 goals/match
1.1 xG/matchExpected goals8/82.23 xG/match
11.4 shots/matchShots8/815.8 shots/match
4.13 shots/matchShots on target8/85.88 shots/match
50%Possession8/849.9%
4 corners/matchCorners8/85.88 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCards3/32.33 cards/match
11.5 fouls/matchFouls8/811.8 fouls/match

Window

Season

8 / 8 matches
1.13 goals/matchGoals scored8/82.63 goals/match
1.88 goals/matchGoals allowed8/80.75 goals/match
1.1 xG/matchExpected goals8/82.23 xG/match
11.4 shots/matchShots8/815.8 shots/match
4.13 shots/matchShots on target8/85.88 shots/match
50%Possession8/849.9%
4 corners/matchCorners8/85.88 corners/match
2.33 cards/matchCards3/32.33 cards/match
11.5 fouls/matchFouls8/811.8 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

4 / 4 matches
1 goals/matchGoals scored4/41.5 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowed4/40.75 goals/match
0.81 xG/matchExpected goals4/42.24 xG/match
9 shots/matchShots4/415.5 shots/match
2.75 shots/matchShots on target4/44.75 shots/match
47.3%Possession4/458.3%
4.5 corners/matchCorners4/47 corners/match
Cards2/2
13 fouls/matchFouls4/410.3 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

6.91 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/18.96 days
2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/11 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade B · Useful evidencelimited
Season samples8 / 8home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Analysis cutoff: Sun, 10 May 2026, 19:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match