Serie A · 2025Sun, 22 Mar 2026, 11:30 UTCFull timeStadio Giuseppe SinigagliaFull-time recap

Como

DWWWW

5–0Full-time recap

Pisa

LLLLW

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	Como	Pisa
Shots	14 shots/match▲	7 shots/match
Shots on target	7 shots/match▲	0 shots/match
Expected goals	1.47 xG/match▲	0.41 xG/match
Possession	73%	27%
Corners	7 corners/match	1 corners/match
Fouls	5 fouls/match	6 fouls/match
Yellow cards	0 cards/match▲	2 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Como's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Pisa's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. Limitation: Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Como's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Como's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

2.8 goals/match▲Goals forLast 5 · Season1.77 goals/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

Metric	Last 5	Season	Baseline
Goals for	2.8 goals/match	1.77 goals/match	1.19 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Pisa show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Pisa's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

14.3 shots/match▲ShotsComo · Pisa9.83 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

Metric	Como	Pisa	Baseline
Shots	14.3 shots/match	9.83 shots/match	11.8 shots/match
Shots against	9.1 shots/match	15.2 shots/match	12.9 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

strong

Como have recorded the higher season possession share.

61.7%▲PossessionComo · Pisa39.6%

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 22.1 percentage points.

Window: season

Metric	Como	Pisa	Baseline
Possession	61.7%	39.6%	49.2%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.

1Como

0Draws

0Pisa

6 Jan 2026Pisa — Como · Serie A0–3

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Como favored in 9 of 14 directional metrics · Pisa in 1 · 4 too close

1.77 goals/match▲Goals scoredseason · 30/300.77 goals/match

0.73 goals/match▲Goals allowedseason · 30/301.8 goals/match

—Expected goalsseason · 2/2—

—Expected goals allowedseason · 2/2—

14.3 shots/match▲Shotsseason · 30/309.83 shots/match

9.1 shots/match▲Shots allowedseason · 30/3015.2 shots/match

5.17 shots/match▲Shots on targetseason · 30/302.73 shots/match

3.23 shots/match▲Shots on target allowedseason · 30/304.67 shots/match

61.7%Possessionseason · 30/3039.6%

4.23 corners/matchCornersseason · 30/303.77 corners/match

3.17 corners/match▲Corners allowedseason · 30/304.97 corners/match

2.28 cards/matchCardsseason · 29/29▲2.1 cards/match

13.6 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 30/3013 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

47%▲Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 30/3017%

77%▲Scoring frequencyseason · 30/3047%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Como97.5

Pisa2.5

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Como87.5

Pisa10.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Como90.8

Pisa9.2

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Como22.5

Pisa57.5

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Como67.5

Pisa55

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 98%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Como47.5

Pisa27.5

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Como70

Pisa23.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches

2.8 goals/match▲Goals scored5/50.6 goals/match

0.6 goals/match▲Goals allowed5/52.4 goals/match

—Expected goals2/2—

13.4 shots/match▲Shots5/57.4 shots/match

5 shots/match▲Shots on target5/52.4 shots/match

62.6%Possession5/536.2%

4.8 corners/matchCorners5/53.2 corners/match

0.75 cards/matchCards4/42 cards/match

13.8 fouls/matchFouls5/512.2 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches

2.5 goals/match▲Goals scored10/100.8 goals/match

0.6 goals/match▲Goals allowed10/102.4 goals/match

—Expected goals2/2—

14.9 shots/match▲Shots10/109.2 shots/match

5.4 shots/match▲Shots on target10/103.2 shots/match

63%Possession10/1038.5%

4.3 corners/matchCorners10/104 corners/match

2 cards/matchCards9/92 cards/match

12.2 fouls/matchFouls10/1012.7 fouls/match

Window

Season

30 / 30 matches

1.77 goals/match▲Goals scored30/300.77 goals/match

0.73 goals/match▲Goals allowed30/301.8 goals/match

—Expected goals2/2—

14.3 shots/match▲Shots30/309.83 shots/match

5.17 shots/match▲Shots on target30/302.73 shots/match

61.7%Possession30/3039.6%

4.23 corners/matchCorners30/303.77 corners/match

2.28 cards/matchCards29/292.1 cards/match

13.6 fouls/matchFouls30/3013 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

16 / 15 matches

1.94 goals/match▲Goals scored16/151.07 goals/match

0.69 goals/match▲Goals allowed16/152.4 goals/match

—Expected goals2/1—

15.9 shots/match▲Shots16/159.4 shots/match

6.25 shots/match▲Shots on target16/152.47 shots/match

64.4%Possession16/1537.5%

4.75 corners/matchCorners16/153.6 corners/match

2.27 cards/matchCards15/142.14 cards/match

12.5 fouls/matchFouls16/1513.1 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

6.77 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/16.9 days

1 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/11 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready

Season samples30 / 30home / away teams

Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against.

Analysis cutoff: Sun, 22 Mar 2026, 15:30 UTC · analysis-v4