Akhmat Grozny
Premier League · 2024Akhmat Grozny 3–3 FC Khimki · Premier League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Akhmat Grozny and FC Khimki drew 3–3.
- Shots
- 11–13
- Shots on target
- 6–7
- Expected goals
- 1.57–1.82
- Possession
- 48%–52%
Full time
What the match recorded
Akhmat Grozny and FC Khimki drew 3–3. Recorded in this match (Akhmat Grozny – FC Khimki): shots 11–13, shots on target 6–7, expected goals 1.57–1.82, possession 48%–52%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
FC Khimki show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateFC Khimki's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Akhmat Grozny | FC Khimki | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10 shots/match | 11.3 shots/match | 12 shots/match |
| Shots against | 19 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
FC Khimki have a visible away split
weakFC Khimki's away-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 13.3 shots/match | 11.3 shots/match | 12 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateFC Khimki have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.0 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Akhmat Grozny | FC Khimki | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 42.5% | 54.5% | 53% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Akhmat Grozny favored in 2 of 11 directional metrics · FC Khimki in 2 · 7 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Akhmat Grozny / FC Khimki
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Dinamo Makhachkala
Zenit St. Petersburg
FC Spartak Moscow
Fakel Voronezh
OrenburgTeam rankings in Premier League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.