Championship · 2025Sat, 2 May 2026, 11:30 UTCFull timeFratton ParkFull-time recap
11Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricPortsmouthBirmingham City
Shots14 shots/match13 shots/match
Shots on target2 shots/match5 shots/match
Expected goals0.74 xG/match1.67 xG/match
Possession52%48%
Corners3 corners/match9 corners/match
Fouls19 fouls/match10 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Kai Wagner · Birmingham City · 77′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedAdrian Segečić · Portsmouth · 15′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedConnor Ogilvie · Portsmouth · 15′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedConor Chaplin · Portsmouth · 27′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedAndre Dozzell · Portsmouth · 49′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedJacob Brown · Portsmouth · 53′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedTommy Doyle · Birmingham City · 88′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedMillenic Alli · Portsmouth · 70′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedAdrian Segečić · Portsmouth · 80′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedIbane Bowat · Portsmouth · 86′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedJacob Brown · Portsmouth · 7′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedAdrian Segečić · Portsmouth · 32′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedConor Chaplin · Portsmouth · 45′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedTommy Doyle · Birmingham City · 57′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedAdrian Segečić · Portsmouth · 8′ · 0.05 xG · goalAugust Priske · Birmingham City · 18′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedIbrahim Osman · Birmingham City · 39′ · 0.05 xG · on targetIbrahim Osman · Birmingham City · 75′ · 0.06 xG · off target or blockedCarlos Vicente · Birmingham City · 43′ · 0.07 xG · on targetMillenic Alli · Portsmouth · 64′ · 0.07 xG · off target or blockedIbrahim Osman · Birmingham City · 74′ · 0.11 xG · on targetConor Chaplin · Portsmouth · 53′ · 0.12 xG · on targetIbrahim Osman · Birmingham City · 52′ · 0.13 xG · off target or blockedIbrahim Osman · Birmingham City · 90′ · 0.14 xG · off target or blockedAugust Priske · Birmingham City · 19′ · 0.16 xG · goalAugust Priske · Birmingham City · 36′ · 0.23 xG · on targetJay Stansfield · Birmingham City · 12′ · 0.24 xG · off target or blocked
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Portsmouth: 14 shots, 2 on target, 0.55 xG. Birmingham City: 13 shots, 5 on target, 1.31 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

00.751.50′HT90′Adrian Segečić · Portsmouth · 8′August Priske · Birmingham City · 19′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Portsmouth 0.55 xG · Birmingham City 1.31 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Portsmouth's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Birmingham City's away-only shot average is below their full-season average. Limitation: Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Portsmouth's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Portsmouth's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

1.6 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1.07 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for1.6 goals/match1.07 goals/match1.27 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Birmingham City have a visible away split

strong

Birmingham City's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.

9.95 shots/matchShotsAway only · Season13.7 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: away

MetricAway onlySeasonBaseline
Shots9.95 shots/match13.7 shots/match12.4 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Recent scheduling adds useful context

weak

A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Portsmouth, Birmingham City.

6.9 daysRest daysPortsmouth · Birmingham City6.9 days
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.

Window: previous 14 days

MetricPortsmouthBirmingham CityBaseline
Rest days6.9 days6.9 days
Matches last 14 days3 matches3 matches

Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.

0Portsmouth
0Draws
1Birmingham City
Birmingham CityPortsmouth · Championship40

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Portsmouth favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · Birmingham City in 10 · 4 too close

1.07 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 46/461.24 goals/match
1.39 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 46/461.22 goals/match
1.1 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 46/461.35 xG/match
1.18 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 46/461.05 xG/match
12.1 shots/matchShotsseason · 45/4513.7 shots/match
11.5 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 45/4510.7 shots/match
3.58 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 45/454.18 shots/match
3.89 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 45/453.47 shots/match
50.2%Possessionseason · 45/4554.1%
5.62 corners/matchCornersseason · 45/455.82 corners/match
5.04 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 45/454.02 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
10.2 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 45/4511.6 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
22%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 46/4622%
72%Scoring frequencyseason · 46/4676%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Portsmouth47.9
Birmingham City77.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 98%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Portsmouth28.5
Birmingham City62.5
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 99%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Portsmouth56.9
Birmingham City81.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 99%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Portsmouth31.2
Birmingham City52.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 98%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Portsmouth27.1
Birmingham City81.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 49%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Portsmouth72.9
Birmingham City85.4
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 98%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Portsmouth40.6
Birmingham City78.1
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 98%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches
1.6 goals/matchGoals scored5/51.6 goals/match
1.4 goals/matchGoals allowed5/50.8 goals/match
1.05 xG/matchExpected goals5/51.48 xG/match
9.6 shots/matchShots5/513.6 shots/match
2.8 shots/matchShots on target5/55.8 shots/match
44%Possession5/548.6%
2.6 corners/matchCorners5/56 corners/match
Cards0/0
12.6 fouls/matchFouls5/511.4 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches
1.3 goals/matchGoals scored10/101.1 goals/match
1.7 goals/matchGoals allowed10/100.9 goals/match
1.05 xG/matchExpected goals10/101.16 xG/match
11.2 shots/matchShots10/1013.1 shots/match
3.5 shots/matchShots on target10/105.1 shots/match
46.3%Possession10/1052.4%
4.7 corners/matchCorners10/106.2 corners/match
Cards0/0
11.9 fouls/matchFouls10/1012.8 fouls/match

Window

Season

46 / 46 matches
1.07 goals/matchGoals scored46/461.24 goals/match
1.39 goals/matchGoals allowed46/461.22 goals/match
1.1 xG/matchExpected goals46/461.35 xG/match
12.1 shots/matchShots45/4513.7 shots/match
3.58 shots/matchShots on target45/454.18 shots/match
50.2%Possession45/4554.1%
5.62 corners/matchCorners45/455.82 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.2 fouls/matchFouls45/4511.6 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

23 / 23 matches
1.09 goals/matchGoals scored23/230.78 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowed23/231.48 goals/match
1.37 xG/matchExpected goals23/230.91 xG/match
15.4 shots/matchShots22/229.95 shots/match
4.27 shots/matchShots on target22/222.64 shots/match
53.5%Possession22/2253.2%
6.27 corners/matchCorners22/225.05 corners/match
Cards0/0
10 fouls/matchFouls22/2212.3 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

6.9 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/16.9 days
3 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/13 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready
Season samples46 / 46home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 2 May 2026, 15:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match