Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Super League · 2026Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Shanghai Port · Super League
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1.37–1.57
- Expected goals
- 1.24–1.28
- Shots
- 10.8–12
- Possession
- 42.7%–58.6%
30-second read
What the record shows
One pattern stands out in the record: shanghai Port have recorded the higher season possession share. The next-strongest reading is weaker: tianjin Jinmen Tiger's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. Limitation: Lineup availability and tactical choices are not in the retained data.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger's recent record differs from the season
moderateTianjin Jinmen Tiger's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1 goal/match | 1.37 goals/match | 1.49 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Shanghai Port have a visible away split
moderateShanghai Port's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 9.07 shots/match | 12 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateTianjin Jinmen Tiger's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Shanghai Port | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10.8 shots/match | 12 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
| Shots against | 13.8 shots/match | 11.6 shots/match | 13.4 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Tianjin Jinmen Tiger favored in 4 of 13 directional metrics · Shanghai Port in 7 · 2 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger / Shanghai Port
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang
Chengdu Rongcheng
Dalian Yingbo FC
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
Qingdao HainiuTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.