Qingdao Hainiu
Super League · 2026Qingdao Hainiu vs Beijing Guoan · Super League
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1.31–1.88
- Expected goals
- 1.35–1.68
- Shots
- 12.8–15.1
- Possession
- 45%–59.2%
30-second read
What the record shows
One pattern stands out in the record: beijing Guoan have recorded the higher season possession share. The next-strongest reading is weaker: qingdao Hainiu's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. Limitation: At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Qingdao Hainiu's recent record differs from the season
moderateQingdao Hainiu's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 0.8 goals/match | 1.31 goals/match | 1.44 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Beijing Guoan have a visible away split
moderateBeijing Guoan's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 12 shots/match | 15.1 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
The teams have contrasting possession records
strongBeijing Guoan have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 14.2 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Qingdao Hainiu | Beijing Guoan | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 45% | 59.2% | 49.3% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Qingdao Hainiu favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Beijing Guoan in 12 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Rest before fixture · Both teams: 35 days
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Qingdao Hainiu / Beijing Guoan
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
More football
Related matches
Liaoning Tieren FC
Qingdao West Coast
Chengdu Rongcheng
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Shanghai Shenhua
Yunnan YukunTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.