Mjällby AIF
Allsvenskan · 2026Mjällby AIF vs Hammarby IF · Allsvenskan
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1.22–2.13
- Expected goals
- 1.71–2.69
- Shots
- 12.7–21.2
- Possession
- 51.3%–61.1%
30-second read
What the record shows
One pattern stands out in the record: hammarby IF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. The next-strongest reading is weaker: mjällby AIF's last-five goals scored average is below their season average. Limitation: Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Hammarby IF show a distinct attacking-volume record
strongHammarby IF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Mjällby AIF | Hammarby IF | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 12.7 shots/match | 21.2 shots/match | 13.7 shots/match |
| Shots against | 15.8 shots/match | 9.41 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Mjällby AIF's recent record differs from the season
moderateMjällby AIF's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 0.8 goals/match | 1.22 goals/match | 1.5 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateHammarby IF have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 9.9 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Mjällby AIF | Hammarby IF | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 51.3% | 61.1% | 49.4% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Mjällby AIF favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Hammarby IF in 13
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Mjällby AIF / Hammarby IF
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
More football
Related matches
Örgryte IS
IK Sirius
IF Elfsborg
Malmö FF
BK Häcken
Degerfors IFTeam rankings in Allsvenskan
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.