Allsvenskan · 2026Wed, 22 Apr 2026, 17:00 UTCFull timeBorås ArenaFull-time recap

IF Elfsborg

WDW

2–1Full-time recap

Djurgardens IF

WWL

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	IF Elfsborg	Djurgardens IF
Shots	9 shots/match	19 shots/match▲
Shots on target	3 shots/match	5 shots/match▲
Possession	24%	76%
Corners	2 corners/match	7 corners/match
Fouls	16 fouls/match	6 fouls/match
Yellow cards	3 cards/match	2 cards/match▲

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Djurgardens IF have recorded the higher season possession share. A second useful context is: Djurgardens IF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

Djurgardens IF have recorded the higher season possession share.

36.8%▲PossessionIF Elfsborg · Djurgardens IF64.5%

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 27.8 percentage points.

Window: season

Metric	IF Elfsborg	Djurgardens IF	Baseline
Possession	36.8%	64.5%	48.1%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Djurgardens IF show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Djurgardens IF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

9.5 shots/match▲ShotsIF Elfsborg · Djurgardens IF17.8 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

Metric	IF Elfsborg	Djurgardens IF	Baseline
Shots	9.5 shots/match	17.8 shots/match	11.9 shots/match
Shots against	12.8 shots/match	8.75 shots/match	12.5 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

IF Elfsborg favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · Djurgardens IF in 0 · 14 too close

1.75 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 4/41.25 goals/match

0.75 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 4/41.25 goals/match

1.25 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 3/0—

0.67 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 3/0—

9.5 shots/matchShotsseason · 4/417.8 shots/match

12.8 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 4/48.75 shots/match

3.5 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 4/45.25 shots/match

2.75 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 4/43.75 shots/match

36.8%Possessionseason · 4/464.5%

3 corners/matchCornersseason · 4/48 corners/match

7.25 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 4/42.5 corners/match

—Cardsseason · 0/0—

14.5 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 4/410.8 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

50%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 4/425%

100%Scoring frequencyseason · 4/475%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

IF Elfsborg3.1

Djurgardens IF90.6

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

IF Elfsborg39.6

Djurgardens IF70.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

IF Elfsborg69.8

Djurgardens IF76

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

IF Elfsborg53.1

Djurgardens IF59.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

IF Elfsborg75

Djurgardens IF9.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

IF Elfsborg15.6

Djurgardens IF96.9

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

IF Elfsborg33.6

Djurgardens IF68.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

4 / 4 matches

1.75 goals/match▲Goals scored4/41.25 goals/match

0.75 goals/match▲Goals allowed4/41.25 goals/match

1.25 xG/matchExpected goals3/0—

9.5 shots/matchShots4/4▲17.8 shots/match

3.5 shots/matchShots on target4/4▲5.25 shots/match

36.8%Possession4/464.5%

3 corners/matchCorners4/48 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

14.5 fouls/matchFouls4/410.8 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

4 / 4 matches

1.75 goals/match▲Goals scored4/41.25 goals/match

0.75 goals/match▲Goals allowed4/41.25 goals/match

1.25 xG/matchExpected goals3/0—

9.5 shots/matchShots4/4▲17.8 shots/match

3.5 shots/matchShots on target4/4▲5.25 shots/match

36.8%Possession4/464.5%

3 corners/matchCorners4/48 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

14.5 fouls/matchFouls4/410.8 fouls/match

Window

Season

4 / 4 matches

1.75 goals/match▲Goals scored4/41.25 goals/match

0.75 goals/match▲Goals allowed4/41.25 goals/match

1.25 xG/matchExpected goals3/0—

9.5 shots/matchShots4/4▲17.8 shots/match

3.5 shots/matchShots on target4/4▲5.25 shots/match

36.8%Possession4/464.5%

3 corners/matchCorners4/48 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

14.5 fouls/matchFouls4/410.8 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

2 / 2 matches

—Goals scored2/2—

—Goals allowed2/2—

—Expected goals1/0—

—Shots2/2—

—Shots on target2/2—

—Possession2/2—

—Corners2/2—

—Cards0/0—

—Fouls2/2—

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

5 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/15 days

2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited

Season samples4 / 4home / away teams

Recent samples4 / 4last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against, cards.
The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.

Analysis cutoff: Wed, 22 Apr 2026, 21:00 UTC · analysis-v4