Allsvenskan · 2026Wed, 22 Apr 2026, 17:00 UTCFull time3ArenaFull-time recap

Hammarby FF

WLW

1–1Full-time recap

Halmstad

LLD

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	Hammarby FF	Halmstad
Shots	20 shots/match▲	9 shots/match
Shots on target	4 shots/match▲	3 shots/match
Possession	77%	23%
Corners	9 corners/match	0 corners/match
Fouls	13 fouls/match	14 fouls/match
Yellow cards	2 cards/match▲	3 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Hammarby FF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. A second useful context is: Hammarby FF have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

Hammarby FF show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Hammarby FF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

21 shots/match▲ShotsHammarby FF · Halmstad9.25 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

Metric	Hammarby FF	Halmstad	Baseline
Shots	21 shots/match	9.25 shots/match	11.9 shots/match
Shots against	11.5 shots/match	17.8 shots/match	12.5 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

Hammarby FF have recorded the higher season possession share.

65.5%▲PossessionHammarby FF · Halmstad39.8%

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 25.8 percentage points.

Window: season

Metric	Hammarby FF	Halmstad	Baseline
Possession	65.5%	39.8%	48.1%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Hammarby FF favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · Halmstad in 0 · 14 too close

3 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 4/40.75 goals/match

1 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 4/41.75 goals/match

—Expected goalsseason · 1/1—

—Expected goals allowedseason · 1/1—

21 shots/matchShotsseason · 4/49.25 shots/match

11.5 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 4/417.8 shots/match

7.5 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 4/43.5 shots/match

4.5 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 4/44.5 shots/match

65.5%Possessionseason · 4/439.8%

4.75 corners/matchCornersseason · 4/41.5 corners/match

3 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 4/44.75 corners/match

—Cardsseason · 0/0—

12.8 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 4/414.8 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

25%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 4/40%

75%Scoring frequencyseason · 4/475%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Hammarby FF96.9

Halmstad9.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Hammarby FF95.9

Halmstad16.7

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Hammarby FF65.6

Halmstad29.2

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Hammarby FF96.9

Halmstad28.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Hammarby FF53.1

Halmstad84.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Hammarby FF40.6

Halmstad3.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Hammarby FF71.9

Halmstad28.9

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

4 / 4 matches

3 goals/match▲Goals scored4/40.75 goals/match

1 goals/match▲Goals allowed4/41.75 goals/match

—Expected goals1/1—

21 shots/match▲Shots4/49.25 shots/match

7.5 shots/match▲Shots on target4/43.5 shots/match

65.5%Possession4/439.8%

4.75 corners/matchCorners4/41.5 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

12.8 fouls/matchFouls4/414.8 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

4 / 4 matches

3 goals/match▲Goals scored4/40.75 goals/match

1 goals/match▲Goals allowed4/41.75 goals/match

—Expected goals1/1—

21 shots/match▲Shots4/49.25 shots/match

7.5 shots/match▲Shots on target4/43.5 shots/match

65.5%Possession4/439.8%

4.75 corners/matchCorners4/41.5 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

12.8 fouls/matchFouls4/414.8 fouls/match

Window

Season

4 / 4 matches

3 goals/match▲Goals scored4/40.75 goals/match

1 goals/match▲Goals allowed4/41.75 goals/match

—Expected goals1/1—

21 shots/match▲Shots4/49.25 shots/match

7.5 shots/match▲Shots on target4/43.5 shots/match

65.5%Possession4/439.8%

4.75 corners/matchCorners4/41.5 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

12.8 fouls/matchFouls4/414.8 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

3 / 2 matches

4 goals/matchGoals scored3/2—

0.67 goals/matchGoals allowed3/2—

—Expected goals1/0—

22.7 shots/matchShots3/2—

8.67 shots/matchShots on target3/2—

64%Possession3/2—

5.67 corners/matchCorners3/2—

—Cards0/0—

12.7 fouls/matchFouls3/2—

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

4.17 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/14.17 days

2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited

Season samples4 / 4home / away teams

Recent samples4 / 4last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against, cards.
The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.

Analysis cutoff: Wed, 22 Apr 2026, 21:00 UTC · analysis-v4