Djurgårdens IF
Allsvenskan · 2026Djurgårdens IF 0–1 Malmö FF · Allsvenskan
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Malmö FF won 0–1.
- Shots
- 19–5
- Shots on target
- 2–1
- Possession
- 63%–37%
Full time
What the match recorded
Malmo FF beat Djurgardens IF 1–0. Recorded in this match (Djurgardens IF – Malmo FF): shots 19–5, shots on target 2–1, possession 63%–37%, corners 10–2. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Djurgardens IF show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakDjurgardens IF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Djurgardens IF | Malmo FF | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 17.3 shots/match | 12 shots/match | 10.8 shots/match |
| Shots against | 8.67 shots/match | 15 shots/match | 9.67 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
The teams have contrasting possession records
weakDjurgardens IF have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 13.7 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Djurgardens IF | Malmo FF | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 60.7% | 47% | 50% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Djurgårdens IF favored in 0 of 9 directional metrics · Malmö FF in 0 · 9 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
Djurgårdens IF / Malmö FF
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
- Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against, cards.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
More football
Related matches
IF Elfsborg
GAIS
Degerfors IF
Halmstads BK
IFK GöteborgTeam rankings in Allsvenskan
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.