Championship · 2025Sat, 16 Aug 2025, 14:00 UTCFull timeEwood ParkFull-time recap
12Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricBlackburn RoversBirmingham City
Shots5 shots/match8 shots/match
Shots on target2 shots/match4 shots/match
Expected goals0.43 xG/match2 xG/match
Possession41%59%
Corners3 corners/match5 corners/match
Fouls14 fouls/match13 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Demarai Gray · Birmingham City · 67′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedAlex Cochrane · Birmingham City · 5′ · 0.02 xG · on targetTodd Cantwell · Blackburn Rovers · 50′ · 0.03 xG · goalTomoki Iwata · Birmingham City · 62′ · 0.03 xG · on targetAugustus Kargbo · Blackburn Rovers · 63′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedJay Stansfield · Birmingham City · 76′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedKeshi Anderson · Birmingham City · 2′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedScott Wharton · Blackburn Rovers · 83′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedYuki Ohashi · Blackburn Rovers · 73′ · 0.13 xG · off target or blockedMakhtar Gueye · Blackburn Rovers · 90′ · 0.18 xG · on targetEthan Laird · Birmingham City · 58′ · 0.34 xG · off target or blockedLyndon Dykes · Birmingham City · 90′ · 0.70 xG · goalJay Stansfield · Birmingham City · 90′ · 0.82 xG · goal
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Blackburn Rovers: 5 shots, 2 on target, 0.42 xG. Birmingham City: 8 shots, 4 on target, 2.01 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

01.252.50′HT90′Todd Cantwell · Blackburn Rovers · 50′Lyndon Dykes · Birmingham City · 90′Jay Stansfield · Birmingham City · 90′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Blackburn Rovers 0.42 xG · Birmingham City 2.01 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The available record does not support a clear cross-team pattern. No second pattern clears the sample and coverage gates. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages · sample sizes shown with each metric. Context, not a forecast.

Where the edge is

Blackburn Rovers favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Birmingham City in 0 · 13 too close

Goals scoredseason · 2/2
Goals allowedseason · 2/2
Expected goalsseason · 2/2
Expected goals allowedseason · 2/2
Shotsseason · 2/2
Shots allowedseason · 2/2
Shots on targetseason · 2/2
Shots on target allowedseason · 2/2
Possessionseason · 2/2
Cornersseason · 2/2
Corners allowedseason · 2/2
Cardsseason · 0/0
Foulsseason · 2/2
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 2/2
Scoring frequencyseason · 2/2

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Blackburn Rovers
Birmingham City
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Blackburn Rovers
Birmingham City
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Blackburn Rovers
Birmingham City
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Blackburn Rovers
Birmingham City
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Blackburn Rovers
Birmingham City
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Blackburn Rovers
Birmingham City
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Blackburn Rovers
Birmingham City
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Season

Blackburn Rovers2 matchesBirmingham City2 matches
Goals scored2/2
Goals allowed2/2
Expected goals2/2
Shots2/2
Shots on target2/2
Possession2/2
Corners2/2
Cards0/0
Fouls2/2

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

Blackburn Rovers1 matchesBirmingham City1 matches
Goals scored1/1
Goals allowed1/1
Expected goals1/1
Shots1/1
Shots on target1/1
Possession1/1
Corners1/1
Cards0/0
Fouls1/1

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/17.79 days
1 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/11 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited
Season samples2 / 2home / away teams
Recent samples2 / 2last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 16 Aug 2025, 18:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match